I see some of the degrees. But from my perspective, I played out five nights a week between 1978 and 1989. I bought a house with my earnings from music. I was paid a reasonable wage for my efforts. To me, those were the things that made me and others around me professional. Some of us were well schooled, some less so, but we had a common thread in that we all had figured out how to make money in live music, money that was good enough to pay the bills and feed our families.
What it implicitly also meant was that we had to deliver a product to our audiences that they wanted to pay money to hear.
What got me started on this whole thing was a post a few days ago on Facebook where a friend was chastizing other musicians for not coming out and supporting other bands in "the local scene." He seemed to be saying that only through the warm bodies of other musicians would our collective dreams and aspirations be met. And then, with no trace of irony, he suggested that we shoudn't let money be a factor because "we all get in for free."
I'm like, how is that supportive, if you're not even spending what it takes to get us all gas money? And what incentive does a professional musician have to want to be a part of that kind of scene in the first place? This guy is touting himself as a promoter but I'm sitting there thinking job one of a promoter is to get your talent a paycheck. Am I really this much out of touch?
The sad fact is today nobody wants to pay for anything they can get for free on their cell phone. Streaming music
and music videos have severely impacted and undercut our market. If you wonder why there is no support, no gigs, ask yourself honestly, why us?