TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
BassGod said:Hot Roded,
No problem, glad to be of service
The Nickel Lo-Riders IMO are the better string over Fender. The Lo-Riders will last a lot longer, and from what i remember the Fenders were harder on my fingers. I just felt the Lo-Riders had a overall better tone than the Fenders. Hmm, it's hard to describe, but I really think you will like the Lo-Riders. Especially if you like that mid-low tone.
Peace,
Graeme![]()
I was a tremendous fan of DR strings, but they staunchly refused to wind anything bigger than a .135 and I was determined to use a low F# (and eventually a C#), so I had to go elsewhere.HotRoded said:I bought in installed DR's nickel Lo-Riders for both my basses... tone, playability, sustain, and the B-string on my Jazz 5 is much more consistant... I like big bottom and I am happy with these strings...
I like the nickle Low Riders better than the Stainless. They sound fatter and smoother to me. Also tried Ernie Balls and D'Addario; XL and Slowwounds. The Slowwounds didn't stay on very long, they seemed to iritate my skin(?) but the XL's are OK. I liked the Ernie Balls a bit more than the XL's but not as much as the Low Riders. The DR's have alot lower tension and just sound smoother, fatter and still have better harmonics and tones than the others. I have a Lakland 55-94 Classic on the way this week and will put them on that as well, though I am curious how some TI Jazz Flat might sound.bryan bailey said:I hate being undicided about strings, any one try/use nickle low rider DR's? And if people use them tell me how are they compared to other nickel roundwound steals
rmars said:I have a Lakland 55-94 Classic on the way this week and will put them on that as well, though I am curious how some TI Jazz Flat might sound.