In reply to a few E-mails about what i posted, let me take it a step further and give a simple analogy of what i said.
It is just an analogy, so nothing more to read into other than its face value.
Hey diddle diddle, the cat and the fiddle,
The cow jumped over the moon,
The little boy laughed to see such fun,
And the dish ran away with the spoon.
In learning this nursery rhyme we learn that there are,
2 animals,
1 musical instrument,
1 item of cutlery,
1item of crockery,
1 natural satellite.
1 little boy.
We assume the cat plays the fiddle, we do not know for sure what is meant.
We are led to believe a cow can jump over the moon, but the reality is that it is said a cow did jump over the moon.
We are led to believe that a dish can run, and either took the spoon, or the spoon was willing to go, and ran with it, and again the reality was it was said to happen.
We learn that words such as diddle can be used as devices, not context....diddle rhymes with fiddle so it has a value of use that does mot rely on its actual meaning.
We learn that there was a boy there who saw this and who thought all this funny, as only a child would, an adult would question what they saw and try and reason why it all happened, a child of a certain age would just accept what it say, or was told.
So if this is what we have learned from this nursery rhyme......then why take extra time to learn it in French?
Yes it would sound impressive, even clever, but what has been learned from saying it again in French?
Hè dupez dupent, le chat et le violon,
La vache a sautè sur la lune,
Le petit garcon se mit a à rire de voir un tel plaisir,
Et le plat se est enful avec la cullère.
Dans l'apprentissage de cette comptine nous apprenons qu'il ya.
2 animaux,
1 instrument de musique,
1 pièce de countellerie,
1 item de vaisselle,
1 satellite naturel.
1 le petit garcon
The information to learn is the same, the same information applies in Spanish, Italian, German, Russian, etc.
We are spending our time learning the same information, albeit in a different form, but we are not learning anything new.
The time we should be spending actually leaning something new...... is being used to re-learn what we already know.
The same thing applies in music, we learn what we like, what feels comfortable to us, what were are familiar with, what we understand.
So a CMaj7 chord is C E G B.
Learn it in Latin and it is still C E G B.
Learn it in Rock and it is still C E G B
Learn it in Reggae, Blues, Rock n Roll etc and it is still C E G B
Play it with a pick and it is still C E G B
Play it with you fingers, or slap it, tap it, sweep it etc and it is still C E G B
Now take this thought process a stage further and look at what you are working on???
Are you actually working on improving or just working on the same ideas?
As i said, you as the student are not qualified to teach yourself, you need another input to change the way or reinforce, what you are learning or working on.
So a book, a video lesson, Youtube lesson, another more experienced player or the best lesson...a face to face with a tutor that will teach you what he feels you need to learn...not what you want to play.
You use what you learn to play what you want to play...that is what good musical lesson are about...giving you tools to learn and develop knowledge, not collect songs.
The old saying "give a man a fish and you feed him for a day, but teach him to fish and you feed him for life", is very true.
But for some it seems it is, "give a man a fish and you feed him for a day, teach him to fish and he will sit in a boat with three others drinking beer, talking BS about why their lives are not better".