TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
what are those pickups?
Thanks. I think it's killer. I have long wanted a proper P-bass pickup in a soapbar shape. P-bass shapes are just hell to route. Same with the old J-bass. "ears" should be long gone by now.View attachment 798567 For this bass:
I kind of agree with you, but a couple of comments:So, Fender has this very famous bass named a P bass. It originally has a 1 3/4" nut width and a chunky neck. But times change and modern players prefer a smaller neck. So Fender slims the P bass neck down to something resembling an elongated guitar neck and lots of players love it. Then modern players ask for a 5 string P bass. So rather than work off the modern 4 string P bass neck as a starting point for the 5 string bass, Fender has the genius idea of making the biggest frikin neck it's ever made with a 1 7/8" nut. Such genius, wow, NOT.
No wonder I end up with Ibanez basses everytime. Looking forward to trying their new 5 string Talmans. 1 3/4" nut width, chunky neck profile, 5 string is my preference.
Thanks. I think it's killer. I have long wanted a proper P-bass pickup in a soapbar shape. P-bass shapes are just hell to route. Same with the old J-bass. "ears" should be long gone by now.
DiMarzio used to have adjustable pole pieces in their replacement P-pickups. a great idea. But I've never had trouble with string volume balance using flat pickups. if it was such a problem, why does everyone love and use J pickups?I agree with you. P pickups should all be slightly radiused or have adjustable pole pieces and be in an ergonomic soapbar casing.
True. Prob a luxury, though it is nice to adjust things with my darkstar pickup.DiMarzio used to have adjustable pole pieces in their replacement P-pickups. a great idea. But I've never had trouble with string volume balance using flat pickups. if it was such a problem, why does everyone love and use J pickups?
I recall I bought an Ibanez years ago that had radiused pickups, and i returned it because the outer string volume dropped off. But I like the idea of adjustable poles. Not a new idea, therefore very do-able.True. Prob a luxury, though it is nice to adjust things with my darkstar pickup.
DiMarzio used to have adjustable pole pieces in their replacement P-pickups. a great idea. But I've never had trouble with string volume balance using flat pickups. if it was such a problem, why does everyone love and use J pickups?
I kind of agree with you, but a couple of comments:
1 7/8" is a good spacing for a 5. the string-to-string spacing is actually closer than a 4-string P-bass.
the 1 3/4" nut width for 5's is cool to play on, but 4 string P players will probably find the left hand spacing rather close.
IME, companies like Ibanez and Schecter have 5 string models that are even closer than 1 3/4" . they are indeed a lot like the old days, when 5 strings first started coming out. back then, companies simply jammed 5 strings onto a 4-string neck. now THAT'S close.
Squier has a bass out with a 2" nut width. that sucker is wide, but the spacing feels a lot like a 4-string P-bass with an extra string. and there are basses with even wider spacing than that. I think the Ibanez BTB's are wider.
I have regular 4-string P-basses (with a proper P-bass neck), 5's with 1 7/8" and 1 3/4" width. I even have one of those Squiers with the 2" spacing (but I had a new nut put on that narrows the string spacing). For my money, 1 7/8" is the sweet spot.
I can't disagree with the parts of that that are an expression of your personal preferences. And, I don't deny my own personal preferences are involved either.
But, logically, I have to disagree with some of that. Fender narrowed the nut width from 1 3/4' to 1 5/8". If narrowing the nut width shrinks the string spacing but people are happy with the narrow nut width then they're happy with the smaller string spacing. If narrowing the nut width doesn't change the string spacing then increasing it doesn't either.
But, the nut width is not the only factor in string spacing. The heel width is crucial. And who ever plays the 20th fret on the E string? Hardly anyone, it's not in the money zone. Therefore, it's not mass production worthy. It's a custom shop issue.
For me personally, 1 3/4" nut width is my comfort zone, no matter how many strings or what scale length or string gauge, even for treble guitars. An 1/8" off in either direction is huge, and bad, for my hands. But an 1/8" wider or narrower heel is not a huge problem for me even if I play those notes. The fret spacing is narrow there so I can deal with it.
I'm also not very sensitive to string spacing until it gets guitar like. My skinny fingers pluck in a MM spacing as well as a Fender spacing very comfortably. I adjust really fast to either string spacing, unlike scale length. I can't go from a 34" to a 30" scale without having to then need to look at my hands constantly or I'm totally lost. OK, enough rambling from me.