- Oct 31, 2006
- 12,122
- 16,796
- Disclosures
- have been on nationally released albums, charting on the Billboard 200
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thanks! I’d leaned towards metric first after buying a set with every size under the sun (not knowing the origin of the bridge and having read that MIM often leans metric for hardware … and damnit I swear I’d tried .05 the day before!! Ha ha.) But I just verified with mine and .05 is indeed a better fit.It's an Imperial size, not Metric.
0'05 is needed.
I’m pretty sure my MIM Mustang (made this year) came with a 1.5mm. Comparing it to another 1.5mm and a 1/16th (the closest standard equivalent), it looks like a 1.5mm to my eyes. Though I could be wrong. And that’s just one guitar.MIM Fender stuff I've used/owned has never had metric adjustments. Always standard.
I’m pretty sure my MIM Mustang (made this year) came with a 1.5mm. Comparing it to another 1.5mm and a 1/16th (the closest standard equivalent), it looks like a 1.5mm to my eyes. Though I could be wrong. And that’s just one guitar.
It is the player PJ one. But maybe that could be sourced from elsewhere for whatever reason.If it's a normal Mustang Bass bridge (not the player PJ one which is just a normal bent plate bass bridge), it's probably sourced from Japan. Fender Japan stuff is always metric.
It is the player PJ one. But maybe that could be sourced from elsewhere for whatever reason.