• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What the heck is Gibson doing?

While I give Gibson some credit for actually changing something because they have traditionally been very resistant to change anything. I just did not care one bit for the sound of the T-bird in this video period. Of course I have never liked the sound of an orange bass amp anyways. To me they have always sounded nasally and this bass through an orange sounds exceedingly nasally to me. He talks about ergonomics and no more neck dive. but yet you notice through the whole video he never takes his hand off of the neck one time. And I'm sure if he took his hand and arm off the base it would dive like a submarine.

I know I might be in the minority here but I wish they would reintroduce the grabbers. Those were really nice bass guitars I wish I never would have gotten rid of the one that I had. Yeah, and I know Epiphone makes one but seriously look at the junk they put in it for pickups. The Victory would also be nice. Speaking of the victory base the headstock on this new T bird kind of reminds me of a reverse victory headstock. But at least they're trying But IDK it seems like Gibson has never really been deep in the base market if it's not a tea bird or an SG bass seems like they don't want to have anything to do with it. The new EB's were nice but alas, discontinued by Gibson after a very short time. Maybe they just weren't selling Who knows.
They cannabilize their own sales for extra profit by making epiphone g3s in China for $1299 vs not making a USA version correct to the original...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 60bass
They cannabilize their own sales for extra profit by making epiphone g3s in China for $1299 vs not making a USA version correct to the original...

You do know the tooling for the pickups is long gone, yes?
The G3 was done as a re-issue in 2012 with Jim DeCola (from the 7ender Custom Shop) designed pickups, a very nicely done re-issue. I picked one up from a US dealer to send to a buddy in Germany, he let me keep it for 3 months before sending it on to him, really a nice bass.
 
You do know the tooling for the pickups is long gone, yes?
The G3 was done as a re-issue in 2012 with Jim DeCola (from the 7ender Custom Shop) designed pickups, a very nicely done re-issue. I picked one up from a US dealer to send to a buddy in Germany, he let me keep it for 3 months before sending it on to him, really a nice bass.
They cry about tooling but had no issue tooling up for those odd looking decola pickups and every other wierd thing they have been releasing. That's not an excuse. 🤷‍♂️
 
They cry about tooling but had no issue tooling up for those odd looking decola pickups and every other wierd thing they have been releasing. That's not an excuse. 🤷‍♂️

Who is "they"
The pickups in this version of the Thunderbird are not something new either, they were first used on the 2013 EB Bass and the 2015 Thunderbird.
You might check your "facts".
 
You do know the tooling for the pickups is long gone, yes?
The G3 was done as a re-issue in 2012 with Jim DeCola (from the 7ender Custom Shop) designed pickups, a very nicely done re-issue. I picked one up from a US dealer to send to a buddy in Germany, he let me keep it for 3 months before sending it on to him, really a nice bass.
IIRC those original Grabber and Ripper pickups were designed by Bill Lawrence. He too has passed on and I don't know if he ever kept any of the design drawings or specifications for those or not.
 
It's not landing the space shuttle to recreate them. Others without the financial backing of Gibson have done it. Novak, etc.

No, but there's no money to be made by doing so either, and Gibson is owned by KKR so...fast ROI is #1 priority.

I, for one, see De Cola pickups as the most versatile "conventional" bass pickups seen on Gibsons for the past 50 years, possibly ever.
 
wow.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atshen
They screwed up the Thunderbird so much you'd think someone from Fender is working there undercover!
Sure, nove bridge, but the headstock is one of the worst things they've ever done.
Boring colors, uninspiring pickups.
I bet for every Thunderbird they sell, Epiphone sells ten.

Show me one example of Fender finishing as bad as the above. Not even a Squier or Sterling would have such garbage finishing. That is literally firewood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atshen
They don’t all look like thst but a lot of them do. I’ve found that in many cases the Epiphones are if better build quality. It’s kinda sad that foreign built instruments are in some cases better than their USA built counterpart.
It seems to be getting that way in some cases. Or at least, different issues per factory, no matter the location. It's absolutely the case for Japanese vs American Fenders. All of my MIJ Fenders would pass a microscope QA inspection. Honestly. The neck pocket, the nut finishing, frets, all of it.

That pic above looks like a bad home stain job on an old night stand you might see for sale at a garage sale. Unbelievable lol. I wonder if SW's 55 point inspection will catch that? :laugh:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Atshen
Show me one example of Fender finishing as bad as the above. Not even a Squier or Sterling would have such garbage finishing. That is literally firewood.

Really?
This 7ender gem seems to have escaped your attention, note that this isn't a singular example. Be sure to watch the review, there are numerous faults, great QC by 7ender.

 
Really?
This 7ender gem seems to have escaped your attention, note that this isn't a singular example. Be sure to watch the review, there are numerous faults, great QC by 7ender.

Yea, modern USA/MEX Fender has a lot of problems. You can find me bashing them in numerous threads based on a LOT of personal experience. But wood finishing like that? Never. That is a new level of not giving a F. Also, that ugly gold foil Fender was like 1200 bucks. This is twice that and the stain job has the same energy as a DIY bookshelf at goodwill.
 
Last edited:
Show me one example of Fender finishing as bad as the above. Not even a Squier or Sterling would have such garbage finishing. That is literally firewood.

I'm quoting you here.

"Show me one example of Fender finishing as bad as the above. Not even a Squier or Sterling would have such garbage finishing. That is literally firewood."

Which I did, easily.

This is hardly a ringing endorsement either.

" Yea, modern USA/MEX Fender has a lot of problems. You can find me bashing them in numerous threads based on a LOT of personal experience. But wood finishing like that? Never. That is a new level of not giving a F. Also, that ugly gold foil Fender was like 1200 bucks. This is twice that. "
 
  • Wow
Reactions: wintremute
I'm quoting you here.

"Show me one example of Fender finishing as bad as the above. Not even a Squier or Sterling would have such garbage finishing. That is literally firewood."

Which I did, easily.

This is hardly a ringing endorsement either.

" Yea, modern USA/MEX Fender has a lot of problems. You can find me bashing them in numerous threads based on a LOT of personal experience. But wood finishing like that? Never. That is a new level of not giving a F. Also, that ugly gold foil Fender was like 1200 bucks. This is twice that. "
Not sure how you detected a desire for endorsement. What I said, and what is true, is that Fender would NEVER ship a guitar wit that level of finish atrocity. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
Not sure how you detected a desire for endorsement. What I said, and what is true, is that Fender would NEVER ship a guitar wit that level of finish atrocity. Nothing more, nothing less.

Best 14 minutes of 7ender QC ever, hope you enjoy it, note that it shows at least 5 different basses with flaws, not just the brilliant position of the pickup.

 

Latest posts