Agreed!!!! That one is sorely underappreciated.Mystery Men is genius film making. I love this movie so much. There are so many subtle little jokes. It's one of William H. Macy's best roles and I'm not being sarcastic.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Agreed!!!! That one is sorely underappreciated.Mystery Men is genius film making. I love this movie so much. There are so many subtle little jokes. It's one of William H. Macy's best roles and I'm not being sarcastic.
With a story like this they have to combine characters and compress stories and expand on others. Like they did with Arya's story in Game of Thrones before the show was terrible. But I don't like how they're doing it in Silo, and the chapter to chapter back and forth like in the books isn't gonna work, and they're not good at basic storytelling. They're good at ambiance and sound design and the acting is good. But they suck at telling this story.I know a few of you are watching Silo. I finally got around to watching S3E1. I've been looking forward to this and recently re-read Shift, which I assumed would be the core of the story this season. I gotta say, this first ep was just poor. Not only are they continuing to mangle the story line and characters of the books, but the result in uninspired writing that the cast can't seem to do much with.
Damn. He was 78. I wouldn't have guessed. He was great in everything he did.Aw man, RIP Sam Neill.
Aw man, RIP Sam Neill.
A real shame.
A great lesser known early stand out role of his was Andrzej Żuławski's Possession. Worth checking out in case you don't know it. He's so young in it and really carries it.
Bret made an interesting point how people call professional wrestlers phonies yet people who are in make believe movies actors.
These are good points and a solid analogy. It was fun to watch back in the 80's and 90's. Entertainment and athleticism.I see some differences...
Pro wrestling presents itself as a real sport (even if it's not too difficult to figure out that it's staged) while movies do not (other than documentaries, etc).
Acting is about trying to find an authentic interpretation of situations written by others. This is very similar to music, if you're playing a cover song, is that pretend even if the song was written by someone else? Other than tribute bands where one is trying to do an exact copy, it's usually about how can you do a more original - and genuinely felt - version of that song. Very much the same in acting.
Sure, there are some similarities but pretty big differences as well. I can see more similarities with stunt people.
The outcome is predetermined, it's fake. As far as pro wrestlers being akin to actors, I'd say they're closest to Vaudeville or roaming stage actors. It's low entertainment, and I don't say that disparagingly.