Excuse the derail - in response to using in-ear monitors - I've just entered that world and I love it. And I'm not playing crazy loud music that necessarily requires them - I'm playing with one acoustic guitar, three vocals and my double bass in 100-300 seaters.
Why the in-ears? Because sometimes those venues have the worst acoustics for hearing yourself. If the venue is an old church or looks like Picasso was the architect, then I know my bass and amp are going to get lost in a sea of low-end rumble no matter how high I set my high-pass filter. Also, the guitarist (and frontman) has his guitar pretty loud in his monitor, so I find his high end obscures my high end, resulting in plenty of "am I in tune?" moments.
So the in-ears for me are a perfect solution, albeit an extreme one (I mean, I'm only playing against one guitar and 3 voices, one of which is my own!). All in it's cost me £220 for a hard wired belt pack, a power supply and a cheapish set of headphones. I still bring my amp, treating it as the main body of my signal and the in-ears as a glorified personal tweeter. If the other members need more bass they can get that through their monitors. I only wear one in-ear, leaving the other so as to hear what else is going on. Also, I'm in control of my signal, taking it from the DI out on my amp, rather than the FOH. I can hear everything else fine, just needed more clarity from me.
After the first gig the bandleader said - "Don't take this the wrong way, but you're playing better and more in tune than I've ever heard you". It was vindication for going to such an extreme.
Why the in-ears? Because sometimes those venues have the worst acoustics for hearing yourself. If the venue is an old church or looks like Picasso was the architect, then I know my bass and amp are going to get lost in a sea of low-end rumble no matter how high I set my high-pass filter. Also, the guitarist (and frontman) has his guitar pretty loud in his monitor, so I find his high end obscures my high end, resulting in plenty of "am I in tune?" moments.
So the in-ears for me are a perfect solution, albeit an extreme one (I mean, I'm only playing against one guitar and 3 voices, one of which is my own!). All in it's cost me £220 for a hard wired belt pack, a power supply and a cheapish set of headphones. I still bring my amp, treating it as the main body of my signal and the in-ears as a glorified personal tweeter. If the other members need more bass they can get that through their monitors. I only wear one in-ear, leaving the other so as to hear what else is going on. Also, I'm in control of my signal, taking it from the DI out on my amp, rather than the FOH. I can hear everything else fine, just needed more clarity from me.
After the first gig the bandleader said - "Don't take this the wrong way, but you're playing better and more in tune than I've ever heard you". It was vindication for going to such an extreme.