Notice the "like/play" in my post (particularly the PLAY bit). You're doing nothing for your cause here. You are stating it is the elite who play jazz. I don't care to start an IQ p*ssing contest, but I am no idiot .
We should have more schools that teach us stuff that the general population has no interest in... Really who cares if you have to go to school to learn something that nobody but your elite club wants to listen to?
The fact is that jazz is unlistenable to the bulk of the population (although so is Ke$ha to me, but she sells).
It really grinds my gears that jazz players will continually consider themselves superior to the rest. SRV, EC, Jimi and Dave Gilmour (among MANY others) play(ed) some very pleasing stuff to the ear of a lot of people, without being jazz oriented.
An analogy - making an F1 car that drives in reverse may be hard (and require high intellect to design) but is it a faster car? No
Please - enjoy playing jazz, but don't put yourself on a pedestal for doing so
There are no pedestals here, man. You seem to be getting confused with deep musical understanding and some idea of the elite and their snobbery. I don't IN THE LEAST believe that jazz is music of the elite. In fact, it's one of the most ridiculous statements I've ever heard. Look at where and when the music was born. I don't know what it's like in your city, but here poor cats play jazz. Whether they're poor cause they play jazz or they play jazz cause they're poor is another question, but elite is the last word on my mind. Look at Monk, Bird or the free jazz musicians I listed earlier, or almost any person playing in that era. To say they, the ones who moulded jazz into it's modern form, are elitists probably shows you know nothing about the music and a decent chunk of American history.
If you go to a jazz gig, you'll also note that all kinds of people go there. Sure there are always the ones who like to discuss philosophical thought through the whole set and sip their red wine, they can get kicked out for all I care, but it is a cross-sectional music.
I never said to have greater musical intellect is to be elite. And those guitar greats who you listed, trust me they're some of my heroes, particularly Jimi, were incredible musicians, just as you stated and did play interesting music. If you read my first post I said that even though jazz is more complex, it is not better in any way. Obviously except for personal taste. You seem to be getting your personal taste, as you keep saying it's unlistenable, confused with the cold, hard facts. Put someone on the stand with a jazz group who doesn't have chops, the jazz kind, you'll watch him suffer. Jimi wouldn't get by in a jazz band without more learning. He's claimed himself and by others to have very limited musical knowledge, a aspect inherent to jazz. Once again, because it seems to be something that needs to be reiterated with you, I'm not saying this makes Jimi a worse musician, I don't believe that myself, it makes him a musician who can not fit into a band that plays jazz. On the flipside, Jimi was studying jazz on his own at the time of his death and there was an album plan for him and Miles. You can hear it in his latest music as well. Plus he had been jamming with John McLaughlin. Clearly he understood that the music was another tier of musical development. B.B. King said it himself, “Jazz is the big brother of the blues. If a guy's playing blues like we play, he's in high school. When he starts playing jazz it's like going on to college, to a school of higher learning.”
For the final time... please, that does not mean that Hendrix or B.B. King are any less valid than Mingus, Monk or Lee Morgan. They just understand that jazz is a more complex art form. Nothing to do with "eliteness" or "snobbery" although sometimes these things do show up, as they do in any circle.
I don't like "jazz snobbery" either, and I do encounter it from time to time. But it's a simple statement of fact that playing jazz can often require a much deeper understanding of some musical concepts than playing music in many other genres. That's just the way the music is and nothing to do with any half-assed ideas about "elitism".
I also think that jazz has a lot wider appeal than some folks give it credit for. It is, after all, a very diverse genre.
Basically everything I wanted to say only clearer and more succinct
