Rotosound....the best sounding.... for a short time....
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I think I'm with you in preference. So which strings meet your needs so far?I like my strings the same way I like my jeans - nicely worn in, but not worn out.
I'm not into zingy brightness of fresh new strings; I like the ones that lose the initial newness quickly and stay in that "nicely worn in" state for a long time.
i think you'd have to define "dead."
In my experience, Boomers.Most of my basses have different strings and I've noticed that the loss of initial brightness varies wildly from one set to another. Thankfully, I don't really mind dead strings at all but I wanted to know what you guys thought the strings were that are most prone to this. I feel like GHS Boomers and Dunlop Superbrights don't stay bright very long. My DR LoRiders, on the other hand, seem to still have much of their initial tone. Your thoughts?
It's not just sweat. Some people have rather oily skin and it releases from the pores when they get hot along with moisture. One of my best friends will kill a fresh set of acoustic guitar strings within an hour and the back of the neck will feel like he just ate some really salty fried chicken. He's not a filthy person either. That's just how some people's body chemistry is.Indeed. One person's "broken in" is another persons "dead".
It makes me laugh when people state they can kill a set of strings in one night, because they sweat so much. Forgive me if I'm wrong - it's been some years since I studied science at school - but I don't think corrosion happens that fast.
Rotosound 66 lose their brightness and snap real quick for me...especially the E.
It's not just sweat. Some people have rather oily skin and it releases from the pores when they get hot along with moisture. One of my best friends will kill a fresh set of acoustic guitar strings within an hour and the back of the neck will feel like he just ate some really salty fried chicken. He's not a filthy person either. That's just how some people's body chemistry is.
I think I'm with you in preference. So which strings meet your needs so far?
I need to try Roto nickels at some point. I've seen enough fret wear to be scared off stainless for now (I like to bend), and I just got into Slinky recently after using mostly D'Addario since the 90s. I had just assumed they were the poor man's D'Addario for whatever reason, but I found the stiffness to be more even string to string and they definitely have their own sound, and the E and A outer wrap seems thinner giving a smoother feel. I need to eventually hear what all the fuss is with Rotos. I'm sure it will be a familiar sound, as the Ernie Balls were as soon as I first tried them.
please tell us you didn't lick the neck of his guitar!?
Echoing a lot of posts here, but IME, Rotos lose their zing the quickest, and DRs lose just a bit, then settle into that tone for a long long time. If I were doing a prog/metal/similar gig, I would probably bite the bullet and do a new set of Rotos every gig or two. Used to do that.
How did you like the Markbass strings?
The soft touch claim is accurate and although being Hex core they seem more pliable and bend slightly easier than most Hex cores I have used with a well balanced but still taunt tension. [Slightly less than Fenders]
Fresh; the overall sound is somewhat warmer[no zing] than other Nickle's I have used when new.
They are very coherent and articulate; E string tone is deep, tight and focused all strings have a nice articulate grind and bite.
I will see how they progress overtime but as of now I am pleased, are they worth more than twice the price as some excellent production strings [$40] ; maybe not looking at it that way but for $2-4 a month depending on how long they last I am fine with that; a small investment if it makes my playing experience a little better.