TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
concept 2 has a lot of potential to be a very pretty instrument--the rendered version seems like the headstock could thin up just a hair, but otherwise the only thing I'd like to see is your ideas on really carving the body so the topography of the top really pops as a feature (maybe the 'cutaway' line extends toward the pickups a bit as a ridge like a Roscoe LG--that kind of carving)
keep us posted, I'd like to see your process!
Wow...Hightech!
I still use pen and paper and things take months on end until they're right!
My last bass design was laid out on the floor for almost a year before it was built .
Now i am at the same place again.
The head shape is decided though.
here I like shape #2...but with the parker -like head of#3.
But...is it going to balance well with the tiny lower cut?
I'd move that lower arch8 which will sit on the knee a tad further towards the head, just to avoid it diving.
Exciting process, no?![]()
I use autocad 2010 (which is awesome btw). I lay out the basic measurements and then its a lot of trial and error to get the curves right.
Then if I want to add the wood, knobs, bridge etc, I import the autocad file into photoshop and basically follow the rendering tutorial I found in the luthiers corner.
my how things have changed. when i designed the bc rich mockingbird in december of '75, i drew it out with a pen on a napkin.![]()
my how things have changed. when i designed the bc rich mockingbird in december of '75, i drew it out with a pen on a napkin.![]()
yes.
I spent a lot of time trying to use pencil and paper and I just am not that good at drawing by
