Or
I am thinking about defretting one of these basses. Which do you think you would like fretless the most?
Last edited:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Sterling all day long.
For me, of course, my stock answer is neither one, but...
I'd choose based on which one has the most adjustment to deal with the loss of the fret height. Meaning, how much of the fingerboard wood do you have to carve into at the nut to get the string height down (this was a hair-raiser for me on my Tony Franklin! lol), can you get the bridge saddles down far enough, the pickups far enough down, etc.
If they're both equal in that respect, I'd then say defret the 4 string. A B string is hard to intonate without frets, so the 5 is the one that's a little more likely to give you grief as an FL.
Minor consideration, though, since it's still not too hard with a good amp. I'd still just defret the one that's the easiest and still has the adjustment, etc.
PS, that Peavey is a nice sounding bass, listen to that B string lol... I think it's fine as-is as a fretted bass but...
L
)I would seriously consider a fretless Status Graphite neck to attach to the SUB. It would look great and actually be a structural (tone is subjective) upgrade over the bass as it stands. The neck costs a bit, but so does luthier bench time. Just my .02.
I see the neck for a Stingray 4 would £319 + VAT and shipping which I guess would make it $500, more or less. The idea of being able to switch necks is very attractive to me. I just need to make sure if a Stingray neck will fit a Sterling body.I would seriously consider a fretless Status Graphite neck to attach to the SUB. It would look great and actually be a structural (tone is subjective) upgrade over the bass as it stands. The neck costs a bit, but so does luthier bench time. Just my .02.
I wouldn’t say so...not any more difficult than the other strings.A B string is hard to intonate without frets, so the 5 is the one that's a little more likely to give you grief as an FL.
I see the neck for a Stingray 4 would £319 + VAT and shipping which I guess would make it $500, more or less. The idea of being able to switch necks is very attractive to me. I just need to make sure if a Stingray neck will fit a Sterling body.
I will check.I completely forgot about that. My dad had one of the SUB Sterlings. I cannot recall if it had the 5 bolt neck with the sculpted heel or the 6 bolt square heel. If it is a 6 bolt I believe they are a fit.
Status Graphite are awesome. I have 2 of their basses and am contemplating a third. Here is what their web site says about MM compatibility:
Musicman 4 string
The 4-string neck is designed to fit on original Sabre and Stingray models
plus the recent Ray34 and S.U.B Ray34.
If your MM4 bass has 21 frets there should not be a problem but please check.
This neck is NOT suitable for 22 fret Sterling, Bongo models or G+L L2000 model.
Musicman 5 string
Designed to fit on the original MM5 bass which has 22 frets.
It should also be OK on some Sub and Ray 5 basses with 22 frets.
It will NOT work with any bass with only 21 frets as the intonation will be out.
Status graphite is cool. Especially on a Jazz but those two Basses look good as is. Hope the quarantine didn’t alter your mind because you’re “bored”.
Or
I am thinking about defretting one of these basses. Which do you think you would like fretless the most?