All the quotes below are exactly what I am talking about when I say that if anyone says anything against, or not in praise of, James Jamerson then they are wrong. The person is ignorant, stupid, uneducated, immature, or just plan and inarguably wrong.
There have been originals since the first person who drew back a bow string. Jamersons lines are no more complex than anything Zappa or Hamm have written. They are no more soulful than what Kaye played. He wasnt ever particularly novel in comparison to his contemporaries.
All you old timers who look back through the scope of nostalgia should become more objective when saying that Jamerson was so great. Just like when you say Edison was so wonderful, you forget about Tesla. Just because someone is the first (quotes because he wasnt, bass wasnt invented in the 1950s) does not mean they were particularly good.
Just because the Model T was the first car, does that mean it is better than a Toyota Corolla? Just because the Fender P-Bass was the first does that mean it is better than a Pedulla Rapture.
Its cool if you like the guy. Its cool if you think he is the source from which all skill and inspiration floweth. But good god, just because someone disagrees with you it does not mean that person is a fool.
You can tell me all day everyday that Cliff Burton was an incompetent poser. You can lambast me for thinking Nick Schendzielos is a damn wizard. You can look at me condescendingly because I do now, and always will, think Jaco could play soulful and skillful circles around Jamerson. Thats fine, you dont like these guys whatever, Im not going to call you a fool for not conforming to what I think a bass player should think like.
You must be GREAT...I'll put you on DDD's 100 greatest list...right between Jamerson and Entwisle LOL
I was expecting this to be a troll thread via the title lol. Man he sure was a beast! One of my all time favorite basslines right there.
I suspect you are underestimating the harmonic depth of his parts. Surely the average Berklee graduate could pull them apart quickly, but they don't yield quickly to mere mortals.
Besides, he did it 40 years ago, before anybody else did exactly what he was doing. Pop music bass was much less sophisticated, and while jazz (and the jazzy side of pop) utilized some of the concepts, the way he put them together was fairly unique, to me as a young person.
So it's a little like saying "I don't get all the fuss over Thomas Edison. I can go to walMart and find thousands of light bulbs."
i always wonder the age of people that say they dont get whats so great about jamerson. a lot times the younger players just dont get the history of it. after jamerson you had everybody grooving like that, or trying to at least. people that dont know the timeline in the history of it all just dont realize there was NO ONE and nothing like that before jamerson.
Very profound. People sometimes fail to appreciate the context that the older artists worked in. Quite simply, music like Motown never existed until Motown, and Jamerson was at the forefront of making it happen. It's really easy to be a Monday morning quarterback. People don't have to like Motown music, but respect is most definitely due.
Why all the fuss? Because he was the originator, and still the best.
He "wrote" these parts on the fly, often drunk off his a$$, laid them down in a single take, and never forget them. Us mere mortals have to struggle to do any one of these things, and generally never get them all together.