Agreed Jimmy. And in Rock, the SVT is the King of all bass amps. In my humble opinion, of course.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Why are Ampeg SVTs so popular?
- Thread starter Whitenoise17
- Start date
-
- Tags
- ampeg svt
Agreed Jimmy. And in Rock, the SVT is the King of all bass amps. In my humble opinion, of course.
One thing is pretty much for sure too, it is a [known] quantity with a predictable outcome.
You know what it will do.
Granted, it is not everyone's "sound"...but neither is DE, MB, GK, Ash, TE(real ones), Pvy, Or, etc..
Everybody has their own 'sound'. Folks like what they like....even if it is an old Kustom 2x15 sparkler rig.
That being said, I think most anyone seeing an Ampeg Fridge Rig sitting there for them to play for the evening would think 'damn, this is gonna be fun'...
You know what it will do.
Granted, it is not everyone's "sound"...but neither is DE, MB, GK, Ash, TE(real ones), Pvy, Or, etc..
Everybody has their own 'sound'. Folks like what they like....even if it is an old Kustom 2x15 sparkler rig.
That being said, I think most anyone seeing an Ampeg Fridge Rig sitting there for them to play for the evening would think 'damn, this is gonna be fun'...
Backline amps that are readily available these days are Ampeg, GK, Hartke, Eden, and sometimes Mesa or Aguilar. For some, the SVT isn't a first choice but the choice that best suits them out of their options. But plenty of people do request it as a first choice because they like it, hard as that may be to believe for you
Agreed.
..and to most they sound great while working!
As an aside- I LOVE (and RESPECT) your "disclaimer"!
Not hard at all for me to beleive! I would prefer my own rig against any backline, but if I didn't have the choice I would go for an SVT without any hesitation!hard as that may be to believe for you
From what I understand tho the cabs themselves aren't very efficient?
As far as shows I'm sure a festival promoter wants to impress bands so they rent for however long maybe? I know a lot of local bands in my day got an ampeg and maybe a 6x10 if not the 8 because well, when in doubt go with the go-to. Last I looked tho I wasn't really turned on by the price tag.
The amp has been in commercial rotation since almost it's birth (Stones 69).
Much like the Shure SM 57,58, it is something that can be counted to deliver every time.
Almost everyone that has used one knows for better or worse what to expect and that expectation translates into dependability. Are there better, different mics, bass amps sure and every production company has different, better mics, amps but I am sure they always have SM 57, 58 and Ampeg SVT
Last edited:
They are the boutique guitar amp of Bass!The amp has been in commercial rotation since almost it's birth (Stones 69). Much like the Shure SM 57,58, it is something
that can be counted to deliver every time. Almost everyone that has used one knows for better or worse what to expect and that expectation translates into dependability. Are there better, different mics, bass amps sure and every production company has different, better mics, amps but I am sure they always have SM 57, 58 and Ampeg SVT
Last edited:
They sound good, and they're very easy to replace on the road, which is usually pretty important for touring musicians.
Unveiled at the 1969 NAMM show in Chicago, the SVT head alone weighed 95 lbs and contained fourteen tubes, six of which were massive 6146 power tubes. To heat all those tubes, massive transformers with magnetic fields powerful enough to cause genetic mutations were necessary. And what kind of speakers were able to handle all that power? Nothing less than two cabinets sporting eight ten-inch speakers and weighing 105 lbs. each.
"THIS AMP IS CAPABLE OF DELIVERING SOUND PRESSURE LEVELS THAT MAY CAUSE PERMANENT HEARING DAMAGE."
Nice!
Who told you that? Pfft!
Volume per pound of cab is not geat with a fridge. You could probably drag that F215 up on stage with one hand.
Lol...or maybe many people still love it, all respect to Greenboy.
The amp has been in commercial rotation since almost it's birth (Stones 69).
Much like the Shure SM 57,58, it is something that can be counted to deliver every time.
Almost everyone that has used one knows for better or worse what to expect and that expectation translates into dependability. Are there better, different mics, bass amps sure and every production company has different, better mics, amps but I am sure they always have SM 57, 58 and Ampeg SVT
I've always wondered how freakin' loud Keith Richards and Mick Taylor were on that tour!
Playing guitars through 300 watt tube amps, WOW!
I also wonder what they did to get distortion from those SVTs. I'm guessing fuzz boxes.
Anyone who knows, please chime in.
They turned them all the way up.
