• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why are bass amps so ugly?

  • Started in 1965 with this, and it's still a favorite for looks and sound.
 

Attachments

  • bassman.jpg
    bassman.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 105
Guitar amps all look fine because they mostly look the same.
They mostly look the same because this is what guitar players expect.

On the other hand, I like this a lot :
Front.jpg

I agree. That's a tasteful look for a modern solid state amp. Classic TC design. Programmable settings would be nice to have. If I ever want a light weight class D amp, I'd look into this. My opinion is that all class D bass amps sound roughly the same, the main difference being how the preamp EQ is tuned.
 
If you want it to be pretty.. put some lipstick and a skirt on it..
As a "native" guitarist, every time I go to Guitar Center I have this thought. Why are bass amps so ugly compared to guitar amps? Sure, there are some handsome classic bass amp designs such as some Ampegs, and Acoustics, but the vast majority of bass amps currently on the market just have really ugly, gaudy design to my eyes. Here's what I'm talking about:

Bass Amps:

CDLaFdu.jpg


Guitar Amps:

JlJK6CF.jpg
 
So after 5 pages have we established that some people just like stuff that looks old, some don't, and that it's completely a matter of personal taste?
In other words, none of it is objectively ugly or attractive, there is just what we imprint on it as being ugly or attractive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Scott
I agree that Markbass are fugly. Something looking like it belongs to a racing track (motorbikes) than any music stage. As well as Orange, guitar amps. Fugly.
But OP, aren't you starting to get a severe case of WAF ?

Wife acceptance factor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wife Acceptance Factor, Wife Approval Factor, or Wife Appeal Factor[1] (WAF), are design elements that increase the likelihood a wife will approve the purchase of expensive Invalid Link Removed products such as high-fidelity loudspeakers, home theater systems and Invalid Link Removed. Stylish, compact forms and appealing colors are commonly considered WAF.[2] The term is a tongue-in-cheek play on electronics Invalid Link Removed such as "form factor" and "Invalid Link Removed" and derives from the gender stereotype that men are predisposed to appreciate gadgetry and performance criteria whereas women must be wooed by visual and aesthetic factors.[3]
 
So after 5 pages have we established that some people just like stuff that looks old, some don't, and that it's completely a matter of personal taste?
In other words, none of it is objectively ugly or attractive, there is just what we imprint on it as being ugly or attractive.

hyperbolic troll-fest thread on subjective matters is as expected.