Him who? Roger? Syd? David?Then they released The Wall and suddenly the joke was on him.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Him who? Roger? Syd? David?Then they released The Wall and suddenly the joke was on him.
But they were a progression of the art form and fit what most people think of as prog rock. And so were other bands that a lot of people label prog (Tull, King Crimson, even Genesis showed psychedelic influences back then). Creative, non-formulaic, more musically challenging to the listener than mainstream 3-min, 3-chord rock. Which, to me, is a big part of progressive rock.That was more psychedelic than prog.
It’s arguable. Since I was around and listening back then, what I saw was a psychedelic band that decided to skew hard toward leaning into the progressive sounds (which was all called alternative back then) once some of the better known progressive bands came on the scene. You’re right that the labels are retrofitted but they still mean what they’re fitted to.But they were a progression of the art form and fit what most people think of as prog rock. And so were other bands that a lot of people label prog (Tull, King Crimson, even Genesis showed psychedelic influences back then). Creative, non-formulaic, more musically challenging to the listener than mainstream 3-min, 3-chord rock. Which, to me, is a big part of progressive rock.
Like @Michedelic alludes, none of those bands went, "Oh, let's make a prog record." We put the label on. But I think most people consider Floyd an important progressive rock band.
Then they released The Wall and suddenly the joke was on him.
Johnny Rotten
I just put all those on my Amazon Music list. Thanks.Disagree with that on the Floyd side. Early Porcupine Tree, Riverside, RPWL, Eloy, to name a few, are all heavily in that Floydian vein.
I can definitely tell that Radiohead were heavily influenced by Pink Floyd and they are a fantastic band....I still have never heard a band that I might confuse with Pink Floyd if I heard them on the radio.I’m surprised that Radiohead hadn’t been mentioned.
Johnny (Lydon) Rotten was good at saying provocative things, and was never shy about slagging everybody...the perfect mouthpiece character to draw attention and promote punk, but punk didn't need him really, it was there long before him and long after him.Johnny Rotten
If anything, the ‘Punk’ uprising, with the attendant New Wave umbrella, was a reaction to the blandness of mainstream rock of the mid-70’s, the sorry state of things on FM rock radio at that point, after all that incredible exploration and experimentation of ‘66 to about ‘72. Granted, not all of that had been sucessful, and then right at that point was the flowering of what was regarded specifically as “prog”, but the status quo radio only recognized a certain small number of bands that fell in that catagory, ones that had a pleasant, more accessible sound in spite of having multi-section suites and flashy instrumental play, let alone catchy short songs that would work as chart hits, which meant that they were back playing the game that the era they came from was supposedly in opposition to. Sure, many of the underground bands of ‘67/‘68 had Top 40 hits, but that fell by the wayside quickly as the freeform era of FM rose to prominence.
John Lydon later admitted that his “(I Hate)Pink Floyd” DIY Tshirt was more for agitating people, getting a rise out of them, and that he didn’t specifically have a problem with the band; after all, he followed Hawkwind around as a teenager, for what that’s worth. He also cited Van Der Graaf Generator’s Peter Hammill as vocal influence, and there was, by all report, an admiration for at least Syd Barrett and German band Can among the London punk scene, plus there was Eno, who had a foot in both camps, as well as bands like BeBop Deluxe. Even before that crew, and setting the stage for them, was Pub Rock, a back to basics movement that rejected the pomposity of ELP, Yes, and the like.
WMMS, back in the '70s.Prog would have died instantly without AOR...Album Oriented Radio. Scotso in NY. Jim Ladd in L.A.
Laquadera in Boston. And many more whom insisted on creating their own playlist, "screw Billboard".
Disagree with the highlighted section. Some people are just wired to compose music that way. Even at my level, I come up with a fair amount of odd-metered riffs just because they naturally sound good to me; not because I'm trying to write in non-standard Western pop music time signatures, for the sake of it.
Prog would have died instantly without AOR...Album Oriented Radio. Scotso in NY. Jim Ladd in L.A.
Laquadera in Boston. And many more whom insisted on creating their own playlist, "screw Billboard".
Exhibit A of our superior musical astuteness.Yes, but you must admit, as musicians (presumably, here we are on TalkBass), we aren't the average consumers of music. We are relative sophisticates, having been trained in musical performance, theory, and composition. Many of my favorite songs are in non-standard time signatures, notably Brubeck's "Take Five" (5/4) and "Blue Rondo a la Turk" (9/8), as well as Pale Saints' "Hunted" (10/8), just off the top of my head.
What exactly was the joke?
Yes, but you must admit, as musicians (presumably, here we are on TalkBass), we aren't the average consumers of music. We are relative sophisticates, having been trained in musical performance, theory, and composition. Many of my favorite songs are in non-standard time signatures, notably Brubeck's "Take Five" (5/4) and "Blue Rondo a la Turk" (9/8), as well as Pale Saints' "Hunted" (10/8), just off the top of my head.
Makes me wonder how many dudes took up flute hoping to be the next Ian Anderson.