No she isn't forward of me when I am occupying the lane directly beside her My car was in her way of clearing the change. Her lane was ending in a right turn only or hit the concrete median or hit me.Hmm, no offense but a little bit of a gray area IMO. She was forward of you which gives her the right of way, except for the fact that she must merge into your lane. She has to do it safely but using the signal and moving over is her only option, except rapidly accelerating or slowing to let you go first. "Merge" is not the same as "yield." If she can safely enter your lane ahead of you, you're supposed to let her.
I let people in all the time in that scenario. It's just a live and let live driving attitude. Literally.
I'm not excusing her for cutting you off, but at the same time if a collision had resulted you would probably be found partially liable.
A lot of people (not you, necessarily) feel they own their lane, and no one else should have the right to use it until they're done with it. If you built the road on your property, sure, but public roads are for everyone. Now GANGWAY!!![]()
The mere act of signaling does nut mean you can begin to move into occupied space. The occupier has right Of way. If you think that's grey, I'm glad you don't live here or there'd be two of you in this town. Shudder.
