Don't get me wrong...that blue one is amazing too!! I love it!
Which ones do you still have?
Basically sold the peacock blue 5 to get a redwood 6. Sold the Millennium 5 Plus and 4J. Still have the rest. The bubinga/walnut 4 was my first bass.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Don't get me wrong...that blue one is amazing too!! I love it!
Which ones do you still have?
Ugly as sin, but the plain truth is extended-horn basses have great strap ergonomics, even if they do look dorky.
In general, it's everything I don't want, a middling '90s-style geek-bass with poor resale value.
The answer to my like, and dislike is the same: It's a peavey. No definable character for me. May be better than fender, or musicman, but those instruments have identifiable voices that have played a major part in shaping music. I've never heard a record and identified the bassist as playing a peavey cirrus. That doesn't make it a bad instrument, just one I have no need of.
Basically sold the peacock blue 5 to get a redwood 6. Sold the Millennium 5 Plus and 4J. Still have the rest. The bubinga/walnut 4 was my first bass.
I'm very much contemplating getting another one. I prefer the ones with a finish...maple, red, or blue, so I'm leaning in that direction. To me the sound of the finished models are all very similar, but the comfort and cleanliness of tone is really why I like the redwood that I currently have.
Out of the ones you've owned...which one would you think has the bassiest tone? I've read that some consider the redwood to be the brightest, but I'm not in agreement. I think the bubinga/walnut I had earlier this year was brighter.
I had a 4 string with a gorgeous top and a matched headstock. Sounded wonderful and had super low/fast action. I ended up off-loading it due to not adjusting well to the longer scale, the neck irritated my thumb for some reason (it was unfinished) and that yummy preamp ate batteries like no one's business.
Well...I am sure glad I read this thread...I purchased a Cirrus Bolt-On 5 Bubinga on 07/02/2008. That's over three years ago. At the time and for much time afterwards the Peavey website stated that the bolt-on 4s and 5s were 34" scale. I did notice my Cirrus had the new "signature" headstock but I didn't think much of any other possible differences. While reading this thread I decided to measure the scale length for the first time. IT IS 35"!!!
I guess 35" scale is no big deal for me since I had no clue I was actually playing one for a very long time now! Peavey does not update its website well enough. Even now it is quite confusing. All those models down to just one now? Really?
My criticisms of the bass itself - I am more of a "dig in" type of player and sometimes that front pickup feels like its in the way. Perhaps I should lower the pickups...they are pretty darned hot anyway. I am not a big fan of gold hardware either.
Other than that this bass is fabulous. Awesome feeling neck. Mine is not super light or super heavy but the balance is great. Fit and finish is suberb and the woods feels incredible with this Bubinga model. I don't think I need to defend the tone of these wonderful beasts.![]()
What slabs down the middle?
Multi-laminate neck-thru = "slabs". Works for me.
Riis
Oh. I guess that makes sense. I much prefer a full top, but can't complain, especially since purple heart is known as nature's graphite.