• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why does my P-bass sound so good?

I have seen those MIM '50s P Basses cited as good basses for the best part of two decades online. I've seen them cited as a step up from regular MIM P Basses and, even, the first tier of workable, good-out-the-box Fender basses, leading into the MIJ and MIA ranges.

I think having a chunky maple neck helps those basses along. They are stable, rigid necks and I think this influences the tone of these basses in a positive way. I doubt the anodized pickguard imparts anything into the mix, and I bet the bodies and electronics are stock MIM gear, unless the pickup specs are tweaked subtly.
 
I have seen those MIM '50s P Basses cited as good basses for the best part of two decades online. I've seen them cited as a step up from regular MIM P Basses and, even, the first tier of workable, good-out-the-box Fender basses, leading into the MIJ and MIA ranges.

I think having a chunky maple neck helps those basses along. They are stable, rigid necks and I think this influences the tone of these basses in a positive way. I doubt the anodized pickguard imparts anything into the mix, and I bet the bodies and electronics are stock MIM gear, unless the pickup specs are tweaked subtly.

Tort pick guards sound the best (as long as they don't weigh too much)
 
  • Like
Reactions: B-Mac and Formula73
I have three great basses in my stable:

1996 Carvin BB70 all Koa body with ebony board.
1999 Sector Q4 with EMG soap bars
2017 MIM Fender Classic 50's P-bass black lacquer, gold anodized PG and maple neck

In my studio, the Carvin and Spector sound great, but out on the gig there's no balls.

The P-bass on the other hand sounds great in my studio, and blows me away on gigs.

The Koa Carvin is so light, and I would prefer to play it because of that fact. The spector and my P-bass weigh the same.

I feel like I should just get rid of the carvin and the spector since the P-bass does everything better.

Anyone else have these same thoughts about their own bass collection?
Sitting well in the mix is a funny thing. Agreed that the P is always a good bet. Sometimes though I think I find the pb tone 'indistinct.' Not sure if that makes sense. :) Depending on the genre, a jb, mm, or soap bars sit in the mix quite well, if EQ'd properly, with more 'character' than a pb. Sometimes I prefer that. Other times, only a pb will do. Genre and EQ are as important as the pickups.
 
  • Like
Reactions: in tune and pbass2
In my experience with P basses, it's because you've got a good sounding pickup, that's put slap bang in a position that just works in a band mix.

This, in spades, with cherries on top and extra salted caramel choco sauce. My Fender P bass sounds great, and so do my other 2 passive basses with split coil pups in or purt durn near the P position.....an Alien Audio and a Maruszczyk. It's not magic. It's simply the type of pickup and its' position that account for 95% of how a bass sounds (assuming it's properly built and not accounting for the big differences between strings of course). The split coil in that spot pushes mid grunt that enhances clarity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jasper383
I have three great basses in my stable:

1996 Carvin BB70 all Koa body with ebony board.
1999 Sector Q4 with EMG soap bars
2017 MIM Fender Classic 50's P-bass black lacquer, gold anodized PG and maple neck

In my studio, the Carvin and Spector sound great, but out on the gig there's no balls.

The P-bass on the other hand sounds great in my studio, and blows me away on gigs.

The Koa Carvin is so light, and I would prefer to play it because of that fact. The spector and my P-bass weigh the same.

I feel like I should just get rid of the carvin and the spector since the P-bass does everything better.

Anyone else have these same thoughts about their own bass collection?
Opinion is subjective & it’s your bass
I have three great basses in my stable:

1996 Carvin BB70 all Koa body with ebony board.
1999 Sector Q4 with EMG soap bars
2017 MIM Fender Classic 50's P-bass black lacquer, gold anodized PG and maple neck

In my studio, the Carvin and Spector sound great, but out on the gig there's no balls.

The P-bass on the other hand sounds great in my studio, and blows me away on gigs.

The Koa Carvin is so light, and I would prefer to play it because of that fact. The spector and my P-bass weigh the same.

I feel like I should just get rid of the carvin and the spector since the P-bass does everything better.

Anyone else have these same thoughts about their own bass collection?
P-Bass tone is pretty much what was heard on almost all hit songs from the 50’s to at least the 90’s. Kinda’ explains why it’s a popular tone…..
 
Same. But, the look of a vintage J sure is attractive. If a bass looks beautiful, I'm more likely to play it. And, I'm a firm believer that a bass player worth their salt can get their sound out of any bass, usually with just hand positioning & volume and tone knob tweaks. And those that say they don't care how a bass looks?? Come on! We're in the entertainment business! Play beautiful instruments! People in the crowd appreciate it. When I leave my flashy basses at home, I always get asked by audience members where they are and why. Life is too short to play boring or ugly basses.
Amen to all of this. But, for some reason, I just don't like Js. Wish I did, but I can't bond with them. I own every thing from a Harley Benton to Fodera. I even have a Dano Longhorn because it looks so different and cool.
 
We also can't negate how the feel of an instrument affects our perception of how it sounds. If a bass feels like a cactus in our hands, we'll perceive it sounding worse than it actually does. Where as, if a bass feels like our favorite comfy lounge around the house clothes, we'll swear that it sounds better than reality.
Yes, psychoacoustics is real
 
Opinion is subjective & it’s your bass

P-Bass tone is pretty much what was heard on almost all hit songs from the 50’s to at least the 90’s. Kinda’ explains why it’s a popular tone…..
This may be true up until the mid to late 70s. By the mid 70s, brighter and stringier with more articulation was the up-n-coming flavor cemented in the 80s. P-Bass players were adding J position mods to their basses trying to roll with these changes and the PJ was born (unless if the P pickup is soloed, a PJ and P are not the same animal even if the PJ began life as a P). By the 80s (the overproduction era), folks were using rounds and trying to make whatever bass they had to sound like an Alembic and the single split P was just another color on the tone palette if the production goal was more classic (hair metal bands often recorded with straight Ps or PJs even if the video showed them playing a bass that looked like a ninja throwing star). I remember PJs like Spectors and Yamaha BBs were definitely in demand back then, but I also remember Stingrays were being favored in studios a lot at the time because of how they seem to sit phat on analog 2" tape. The genre was also important: late 70s/80s Dayton Style funk hits (Lakeside, Pleasure, etc) were mostly Jazz basses as one example
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: in tune
Basically, it's a combination of pickup location and simplicity:

Pickups closer to the neck sound fat and less punchy while pickups closer to the bridge sound thinner and punchier.
The P-Bass pickup sits right in the middle; not too fat, not too thin - punchy, yet still with some "bloom" to the notes.
Other pickups in that spot will sound pretty close to a P-Bass ('51 Precision, G&L L-1000, etc)

The other thing is phase cancellation - a bass with multiple pickups will have phase cancellation that scoops the midrange when those pickups are used together.

A split coil P-Bass has phase cancellation - but only between the two halves of the coil, which sense different strings, so the cancellation decreases noise without scooping the produced note.

That's the basic recipe - you can tweak it with string selection, body and fretboard woods, pickup selection and make it sound brighter, more thuddy, more open - but the basic sound of a P-Bass is a single split coil pickup in that spot.

If you want your other basses to sound closer to a P-Bass, turn their bridge pickups all the way down and just play with the front pickup.

It won't sound the same as a P-Bass, but it'll sound closer.
 
Last edited:
There is a great interview with Michael Tobias where he talks about the combination of an alder body, maple neck and rosewood or maple fingerboard. Although he specializes in a completely different build aesthetic, he says plainly that specific combination just works and as much as everyone wants to reinvent the wheel, ultimately that combination gets that sound that just works.
 
It's called midrange.

This answer, although brief, is essence of why Pbasses have won the hearts and souls of bassists and producers alike. Pickup and placement produce a very middy bass sound without extended top or bottom.

Many people find the sound of a Pbass unexciting by itself. I concur. I get very excited when I hear a recording, either of a live or studio performance, where I can analyze how the bass works with the other instruments.

I own some boutique instruments with Bartolini pickups and super hi-fi preamps. Solo, they sound gorgeous; deep lows, sparkly shimmering high end. In a mix, they disappear. I have stopped chasing that sound. it does not work for me.

Pbass works for almost every genre and you just have to plug it in. No gymnastics with extreme processing or radical EQ curves. Get out of the way and let the bass do what it does so well.... sit in the mix.

If your gig is as a soloist or you play in a contemporary urban gospel group, a pbass may not be the best choice. If you are primarily a rhythm section groover, its hard to beat a pbass.

BTW, Fender Pbases coming out of Mexico are an unbelievably good value.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts