• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why don't all basses have...

I hate staggered polepieces. They’re incredibly uncomfortable when digging in above the pickup, I always hit my fingers on the magnets. That’s the first thing I changed on all of my Stingrays - push the pole pieces so that they’re flush with the cover. Instantly better string to string balance and comfort when playing above the pickup.

Here’s a compromise for you - adjustable pole piece height like on MFD pickups. So if you want to raise them, you can, if you want them flush - you can do that too.

Yes, adjustable poles are best, and one of my main basses is a G&L M-2500 with MFD humbuckers. It had excellent balance with the poles set even, but it's even better with the poles under the A string raised slightly.

Staggered poles don't necessarily need to protrude above the cover. The highest poles could be flush, and others recessed below the cover. No need to have a finger-shredding design.
 
I agree.
I can't understand anybody wanting to have one the old way when there are a few much better ways that don't really interfere with the looks of a bass. But I don't really understand caring about a new bass being an exact replica of an old bass if that means a deliberately inferior mechanical system.
Agreed on all points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kdmoo
Yes, adjustable poles are best, and one of my main basses is a G&L M-2500 with MFD humbuckers. It had excellent balance with the poles set even, but it's even better with the poles under the A string raised slightly.

Staggered poles don't necessarily need to protrude above the cover. The highest poles could be flush, and others recessed below the cover. No need to have a finger-shredding design.
I had the musicman sterling, and hated those raised pole piece.