Personally I just don't think it matters that much. My best sounding basses have nuts made out of bakelite. The other electrics have some sort of synthetic. My upright has ebony.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Interesting stuff...good to hear from the pro-bone side.nah, bone is not that hard to work with. in fact, it sands and files better than most synthetics, many of which warp or even melt under belt-sander friction heat. it polishes better than all of them, giving a much prettier final result. yes the smell is less than awesome (kinda like being at the dentist when they're drilling) but good vacuum dust collection renders this a non-issue.
as for inconsistencies, the first step when selecting a bone blank is looking at it backed by a strong light, you can see any voids or soft spots.
i like the unbleached stuff, it seems a little harder and less porous.
i've made a few acoustic guitar ivory nuts and saddles with blanks provided to me by the customer, supposedly from legit sources. while just fine, the stuff was slightly softer than bone, to where i wouldn't choose it over bone for the same job.
between that and the "ick" factor of the source, i'm gonna pass on ever using it again.
for a laugh, i once made a quicky nut for a guitar i was fixing out of the "worst" material i could think of, a big hunk of red rubber eraser.Personally I just don't think it matters that much.
Totally. If even the worst (solid) material imaginable turns out to not be that bad, seems like probably not that big a deal. As long as it can be shaped and filed correctly and doesn't dampen the strings, probably anything works.for a laugh, i once made a quicky nut for a guitar i was fixing out of the "worst" material i could think of, a big hunk of red rubber eraser.
sounded kinda thumpy on open notes of course, but fretted, i could tell no difference in tone or sustain.
if the stuff is hard enough to not drag on the string or wear out quickly, it's gonna be just fine on a bass.
my '96 american standard P has the stock fender "cyclovac" nut (just some kind of fancy plastic) and i've found no reason at all to change it.
i've seen plenty of roscoes with fancy wood nuts. they're neat and all, and usually very wide, giving more area for the string to rest on.Why don't we see wooden nuts on more basses? Do hardwoods (ebony, hard maple) just make it too costly?
Ahhhhh, okay. Didn't think of how roundwounds wear materials down more than flatwounds.i've seen plenty of roscoes with fancy wood nuts.
i think they're probably in that "wears too quickly" category, especially with roundwound strings. i'd never choose one over bone or a harder synthetic.
when it's like one or two thousandths of height between "perfect action" and "my string is buzzing", i see no advantage in the softer materials.
see, from the other side of the street i wonder about that;Since my upright bass (and I think other orchestral strings) have wooden nuts, I had wondered why it wasn't seen on bass guitars, and now I know... orchestral strings all have flatwounds.
Cheaper to cut it yourself.
Every luthier who I know says that bone is a lot harder to shape into a nut and harder and less forgiving to slot. Indie luthiers don't buy premade nuts that easily fit into a standard nut rout. They shape them themselves to whatever bass they're working on. And synthetics are a lot easier to do that with than bone, and files cut a lot easier through synthetics than bone as well.
See hushnel's post. I might concede the point that bone is not as hard to work with as I'm making it sound, but when you're a luthier, you're dealing with a lot of odd sized nuts, and keeping a whole bunch of nut blanks that may or may not work in a particular axe without being reshaped isn't as practical for people who are practiced in working with those materials.Ya know what's not cheap? Time. The bench time of the luthiers you mentioned who told you bone is "a lot harder" to work with.
Riddle me this; If bone is so hard to work with, why spend any more bench time than necessary to save a little on the cost of an already inexpensive material?
i've seen plenty of roscoes with fancy wood nuts. they're neat and all, and usually very wide, giving more area for the string to rest on.
still, IMO they're probably in that "wears too quickly" category, especially with roundwound strings. i'd never choose one over bone or a harder synthetic.
when it's like one or two thousandths of height between "perfect action" and "my open notes are buzzing", i see no advantage in the softer materials.
i've seen plenty of roscoes with fancy wood nuts. they're neat and all, and usually very wide, giving more area for the string to rest on.
still, IMO they're probably in that "wears too quickly" category, especially with roundwound strings. i'd never choose one over bone or a harder synthetic.
when it's like one or two thousandths of height between "perfect action" and "my open notes are buzzing", i see no advantage in the softer materials.
i don't suppose you have a pic? is the stuff a solid color or is it layers of visible wood? it's been a while, and i recall seeing roscoes with a few different kinds of nuts over the years, even that pretty "grained ivoroid" stuff. (we carried roscoe for a good while, fantastic basses with the best low B i've heard yet.)Those nuts are made with a composite material with the trade name Dymondwood (we refer to it as "diamondwood"), which is significantly harder and more durable than bone, ivory, or even graphite (well really graphite impregnated delrin).
nah, it's not such a big deal to have a few handfuls of thicker and thinner nut and acoustic saddle blanks. by "blanks" i mean just flat rectangles of the material, no pre-shaping at all. grab one that's just a little bigger than the size you're looking for, proceed to sand it down and fit it.when you're a luthier, you're dealing with a lot of odd sized nuts, and keeping a whole bunch of nut blanks that may or may not work in a particular axe without being reshaped isn't as practical for people who are practiced in working with those materials.
i don't suppose you have a pic? is the stuff a solid color or is it layers of visible wood? it's been a while, and i recall seeing roscoes with a few different kinds of nuts over the years, even that pretty "grained ivoroid" stuff. (we carried roscoe for a good while, fantastic basses with the best low B i've heard yet.)
The american pro series (the one replacing the american st over te course of 2017) has a bone nut.
There, fender finally listened to you.
Isn't that material used on the original Curbow basses? I believe the fretboard?Those nuts are made with a composite material with the trade name Dymondwood (we refer to it as "diamondwood"), which is significantly harder and more durable than bone, ivory, or even graphite (well really graphite impregnated delrin). I can attest from well over a decade of use, they don't wear down the slightest, even with stainless steel strings. There is nothing "soft" about a diamondwood nut, and while nothing will hold up indefinitely, this one is at least the equal of anything else we have access to.