• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why more than four strings?

Some just need a wider range and the wider neck is mostly a side effect. Not everybody plays basic rock/blues/country/you-name-it you know. And even if they do they might do it a bit differently.

Oh, wait... What was that sudden deja vu feeling? :D
 
because a low E isn't enough for some people like me. Another low string, with the same thickness in the neck like a 4, a 34" scale, and tighter spacing feels GREAT to me. Lower than E is actually found in so much music. Metal, Rock, R&B, Jazz, etc...

A high C makes soloing way easier as well.
 
Are there any good reasons why 5 and 6 string basses are so popular?
E seems plenty low enough and I don't understand why anyone would want a wider neck. Is it just a fad or craze?

Range, and fewer position changes. If you're happy with a 4, knock yourself out. I prefer a 5- or 6-string, but to each his own.

P.S. I also came to electric bass from a classical guitar background, so 6 strings just feels "right," and the nut width of a 6-string bass is about exactly the same as a classical guitar.
 
why only four strings? why only tune to E? why not G? why not A? why tune it in 4ths? why not tune every string to middle C?
for an instrument that has only existed for under a hundred years, there sure are a lot of purists.

Basses have been around for about 400 years. By the way, many basses had only 3 strings until as little as 100 years ago.

Domenico_Dragonetti.jpg