Well, this seems like as good a post as any to be my first post in over a decade, now that everybody is already all riled up. I like the comment (paraphrased badly) that if Fender was gone tomorrow, its DNA would still be present. I suspect that is the case. I'm neither best friend nor furious enemy to Fender, because Fender is a corporation and corporations make bad friends/foes. I do also like the comment that it's a tad over the top "loving" an instrument, because that does seem a bit too much. I REALLY like my instruments, which does include a Fender, but love would sound like I'm whispering into them or tucking them in at night.
So back to Fender.....I have logged (yep, OCD) playing over 122 Fender jazz basses. Some were bad, most ok, a few bordering on great. The good, the bad, and the ugly didn't seem directly related to year or country of manufacture, but I would argue there are some trends (i.e. Japanese and/or older American's seemed to register more frequently on the higher end.) But even these observations are colored by my own playing style, so they are not gospel. My current and for-the-foreseeable-future-Fender is a 1972 Jazz that has Sadowsky pickups and preamp. It is super ugly, beaten to hell, has no discernible finish, and multiple cigarette burns on the headstock. It's neither the "all that is wrong with the instrument industry" nor "the greatest thing ever conceived."
What's my point? Can't we just agree that there are Fender basses, they are prevalent, lots of people play them, and some people prefer them? Beyond that, we are just quibbling over nothing.