• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Winter build off 2026 - Primal Screamray

Body is looking pretty good with two coats of sealer. My fresh epoxy arrived so I'll try and get a coat rollered on today.
PXL_20260122_065018649~2.jpg
 
That's some pretty maple. In my experience flame is strongest on quarter or rift sawn surfaces. So I vote for the first one. I also believe it could be a hair more stable since the wood always moves most along the growth rings.

But a multi laminate would be my choice. Bruce Johnson has written on this forum a lot on the benefits of multi laminates and grain orientation in general.

That's not meant as an encouragement. One piece necks can work great and indeed have for decades. Make the right choice for yourself.
 
That's some pretty maple. In my experience flame is strongest on quarter or rift sawn surfaces. So I vote for the first one. I also believe it could be a hair more stable since the wood always moves most along the growth rings.

But a multi laminate would be my choice. Bruce Johnson has written on this forum a lot on the benefits of multi laminates and grain orientation in general.

That's not meant as an encouragement. One piece necks can work great and indeed have for decades. Make the right choice for yourself.
Yeah all the necks I've made so far have been multi laminated, and I'm fully behind the idea, but this thing is so good looking it seems criminal to chop it up!
I will be trying to stiffen it up somewhat with some carbon fibre.
 
Got as far as cutting a slot for the carbon fibre tow today.
PXL_20260128_132042201~2.jpg


I think I'm going to have to order a different truss rod. This one would require a slot over 12mm deep which would put it only about 2mm from the back of the neck once it's carved, and leave no room for the carbon fibre. Not sure what these rods are designed for really unless very thick necks.
PXL_20260128_133002236.jpg
 
That wheel is quite large. Even if the center is about 6-7 mm or 1/4 below the neck shaft surface, the top of the wheel will be close to the top of the fingerboard.

Edit: the new truss rod should be somewhat weaker than the red hot rod model there. You can test the difference by taping them together. And I'm not saying that the new one is too weak or anything. Just that this is a good opportunity to get a feel for the differences.
 
Last edited:
That wheel is quite large. Even if the center is about 6-7 mm or 1/4 below the neck shaft surface, the top of the wheel will be close to the top of the fingerboard.

Edit: the new truss rod should be somewhat weaker than the red hot rod model there. You can test the difference by taping them together. And I'm not saying that the new one is too weak or anything. Just that this is a good opportunity to get a feel for the differences.
Interesting, how would taping them together compare which one is stronger?
 
Interesting, how would taping them together compare which one is stronger?
Having one pull in one direction, the other at the opposite? I'm not sure how that would work but it wouldn't hurt to try. I might also adjust them the same amount by rotating the rod and compare the force needed to flex them on a flat surface. Just to get a feel.

If the threads are not identical it's hard to do draw any accurate conclusions on the differences. But I might try comparing them, so that in a future build I could use the information to decide what to use in given circumstances.
 
To be honest it's hard to see how I would use that hot rod on any build, it's just too deep for my standard neck profile, the only way I can see to use it would be to put a relief slot on the underside of the fretboard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beej