One, most people would consider bass to be a bass *guitar*.
True, depending on how "cultured" (or, dare I say "uncultured") one is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bass
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
One, most people would consider bass to be a bass *guitar*.
Okay, I come to the rescue!!
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
36b/sec -> 36 x 60= 2160?? Please ... that is ridiculous :$
"The aim and final end of all music should be none other than the glory of God and the refreshment of the soul." --Johann Sebastian Bach. (Taken from CraigG's signature line).
That answers the question.
Furthermore, somewhere in heaven, the old masters like Sor, Regondi, Paganini, Wienawski, Vieuxtemps, Bottesini, et al., are laughing at the debate over something as silly as BPM. First, because they had more technique than any of these modern-day "shredders" (like Paul Gilbert, et al.). Second, because they had infinitely greater taste, and knew that speed was only another means, or effect, to be utilitzed.
What does it matter if you can play 400 bpm in downstrokes if you have no clue about phrasing or dynamics? Or the architecture of a piece?
I'd like to see someone come on here and ask, "Who here can play pppp?" "Who has the steadiest ritardando through the end of (insert song here)?"
What does it matter if you can play 400 bpm in downstrokes if you have no clue about phrasing or dynamics? Or the architecture of a piece?
I'd like to see someone come on here and ask, "Who here can play pppp?" "Who has the steadiest ritardando through the end of (insert song here)?"
"The aim and final end of all music should be none other than the glory of God and the refreshment of the soul." --Johann Sebastian Bach. (Taken from CraigG's signature line).
That answers the question.
Furthermore, somewhere in heaven, the old masters like Sor, Regondi, Paganini, Wienawski, Vieuxtemps, Bottesini, et al., are laughing at the debate over something as silly as BPM. First, because they had more technique than any of these modern-day "shredders" (like Paul Gilbert, et al.). Second, because they had infinitely greater taste, and knew that speed was only another means, or effect, to be utilitzed.
What does it matter if you can play 400 bpm in downstrokes if you have no clue about phrasing or dynamics? Or the architecture of a piece?
I'd like to see someone come on here and ask, "Who here can play pppp?" "Who has the steadiest ritardando through the end of (insert song here)?"
palm grease;6158579]hahahahahah!!!!
FAIL!
I wonder if Pino, JMJ, Aaron Mills, Raphael Sadiq, Thundercat, Mike Elazondo, Hub, Adam Blackstone...feel that way too? Maybe you should expose yourself to a wider range of music. That might change your view on what you consider to be music!
Who??.. Don't recognize a single name here.. If they are "established" Hip Hop whatevers, then my time is way too precious to "expose" my brain/ears to wannabe artists when there are so many others that actually rate a listen.. sorry
palm grease;6158579]hahahahahah!!!!
FAIL!
I wonder if Pino, JMJ, Aaron Mills, Raphael Sadiq, Thundercat, Mike Elazondo, Hub, Adam Blackstone...feel that way too? Maybe you should expose yourself to a wider range of music. That might change your view on what you consider to be music!
Who??.. Don't recognize a single name here.. If they are "established" Hip Hop whatevers, then my time is way too precious to "expose" my brain/ears to wannabe artists when there are so many others that actually rate a listen.. sorry
dude, stop
hiphop is cool, and those players are kinda pro
pino palladino tours with the who, JMJ with NIN
sooo