When you say that about modulation, does it substitute as a Chorus pedal?Ghost Ridge is my fav...
...very natural sounding—4 types of reverb and 4 preset-save locations. Plus, it has fantastic modulation, too...a "two for one" pedal, so to speak.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
When you say that about modulation, does it substitute as a Chorus pedal?Ghost Ridge is my fav...
...very natural sounding—4 types of reverb and 4 preset-save locations. Plus, it has fantastic modulation, too...a "two for one" pedal, so to speak.
Yes...you can blend the two also.When you say that about modulation, does it substitute as a Chorus pedal?
I don't see how it does chorus, but I don't know how often I'd use chorus. Maybe with fretless. Maybe win an 80's tune.
either way it's certainly an iron to look at for reverb.
I'm a little torn when it comes to effects. Surprise. I don't really need a number of options for each - like 4 different reverbs for example. At least I don't think I do. Reverb would be something I see myself using for say solos in a jazz gig when everyone drops out. Or maybe for an into at church. So something like a Strymon seems ridiculous. Yet I know that the one setting I use will sound amazing. Same with filter or chorus or whatever. DO I want a lot of goo ad what they do pedals, or...
...lots of people like the Line 6 HX. Get all my "one type, once in a while" effects in one unit. Still expensive. And I don't really like menus and such. That's why individual pedals are nice.
...lots of people like the Line 6 HX. Get all my "one type, once in a while" effects in one unit. Still expensive. And I don't really like menus and such. That's why individual pedals are nice.
That does make sense. I don't tour but I get the logic of cost per pedal and all that. I'll never give up my LA-1A, but that and the HX and a decent DI would be a nice little board. I think Ian Alison runs something like that.
That does make sense. I don't tour but I get the logic of cost per pedal and all that. I'll never give up my LA-1A, but that and the HX and a decent DI would be a nice little board. I think Ian Alison runs something like that.
Unless something has changed, I believe Ian Allison is a happy Noble user
But I also need to fit my Rolls PMs50 for my IEM's and a DI.Yeah, you could run the LA-1A either in the effects loop of the Helix or at the end of it, depending on the set up. That would probably darn near fit on a Pedaltrain nano.
This is a tube drive but the size is probably similar:
View attachment 3778683
Ian has a great board. If there were a Noble available at this moment I would think about it. I do have tubes in my LA-1A so I can maybe get by without the Noble. The Stomp Is tempting as I would have anything I might need at my "fingertips" which is cool. And after a couple "boutique" pedals I'd be there price wise. Idk. This is where I circular logic myself to death. A Nano play might hold the LA-1A, helix and Rolls. If I use a passive DI like my Radial Pro I can just tack it on. Doesn't need to be on the board. Then I just use the board as is for gigs where I use an amp - like jazz or singer:songwriter type gigs.Ian's cool pedalboard! At the GTG last November.
View attachment 3778781
I tried running bass->RNDI Thru->JDI->XLR out and that did not affect the RNDI signal to the sound board. It stayed strong the whole time. No difference from when I ran bass->RNDI XLR out-> sound board.I mean use the JDI to load the thru output of the RNDI. Only checking the output of the RNDI. Bass>RNDI>XLR Out of RNDI and compare the output of that with Bass>RNDI>through to JDI>XLR out.
If I use a passive DI like my Radial Pro I can just tack it on. Doesn't need to be on the board. Then I just use the board as is for gigs where I use an amp - like jazz or singer:songwriter type gigs.
Hmm...
I have one of those. Problem with using it with the LA is that you can't use the boost function or turn the effect off. Kind of weird.You could almost get one of those balanced 1/4'' to XLR cables also, seems like that is popular with some of the other LA-1A guys as well as Helix users. Gets the DI right out of the way, so then you're just left with the rolls unit. You might be able to squeeze that in there on a nano+?
Ian has a great board. If there were a Noble available at this moment I would think about it. I do have tubes in my LA-1A so I can maybe get by without the Noble. The Stomp Is tempting as I would have anything I might need at my "fingertips" which is cool. And after a couple "boutique" pedals I'd be there price wise. Idk. This is where I circular logic myself to death. A Nano play might hold the LA-1A, helix and Rolls. If I use a passive DI like my Radial Pro I can just tack it on. Doesn't need to be on the board. Then I just use the board as is for gigs where I use an amp - like jazz or singer:songwriter type gigs.
Hmm...
Right. I also have a Sadowsky preamp/DI pedal that has similar controls (minus the tubes of course) to other preamp/DI's so guys'd an option as well.A lot of people like the Noble. The Oracle is a little over half the price of the Noble and does more of what I want, which is clean(er) tubey goodness. Power can be handled with a $10 splitter cable.
Both my LA-1A and Oracle are always on / set and forget.