• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Worth trading?

Yes. You are already ready to get rid of the amp. If the bass is even a bit interesting to you, the value is even and neither will diminish. You get something interesting to toy with for a while, and if you decide you don't want it later, it's a lot easier to ship a bass than a vintage combo amp. Your market had just gotten exponentially bigger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lofreakwencee
Hello everyone, I’m reaching out to you for advice on a trade. I have a 66 Ampeg B15N in excellent condition (recently serviced). Someone is offering me a 2003 Fender Marcus Miller V in great condition as a trade. I also own a 61 B15n which I am keeping. What do you all think? Any advice will be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
I think you could do better than that.
 
vintage B15s might be diminishing in future value if you consider the shrinking number of boomers and Xers who are likely to be the target market for a 60+ year old amp. Today they still command a high price but you have to consider how you will sell it, ship it, etc in the future. and will it be in demand lets say in ten years. will they still be serviceable?

so If you think the bass is good enough to trade your now valuable amp, do it.

however, I don' t think Fender signature series are real value holders either.
 
vintage B15s might be diminishing in future value if you consider the shrinking number of boomers and Xers who are likely to be the target market for a 60+ year old amp. Today they still command a high price but you have to consider how you will sell it, ship it, etc in the future. and will it be in demand lets say in ten years. will they still be serviceable?

so If you think the bass is good enough to trade your now valuable amp, do it.

however, I don' t think Fender signature series are real value holders either.

Fair points, especially the shipping aspect with the amp. The Ampeg appeals to recording session players and studios, and they always will. Has little to do with boomers.

The Fender MM and the Roscoe Beck sigs alone, disprove your point about holding value, though. Cheers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lofreakwencee
I own a 1963 B-15N and a 1959 Fender Precision Bass. You’re 61 B-15N is a lot more valuable than the 66. Chances are the 66 is a single baffle reflex cabinet where the speaker is mounted to the outer baffle( you should check inside the box to confirm this) The Fender Marcus Miller is just a pretty common bass. Just my take however.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lofreakwencee
I own a 1963 B-15N and a 1959 Fender Precision Bass. You’re 61 B-15N is a lot more valuable than the 66. Chances are the 66 is a single baffle reflex cabinet where the speaker is mounted to the outer baffle( you should check inside the box to confirm this) The Fender Marcus Miller is just a pretty common bass. Just my take however.

He said he's keeping the '61 Ampeg, the question is what are the current values of the two items being traded, no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lofreakwencee
If your house caught fire and you could only grab one which would it be?
B15
I own a 1963 B-15N and a 1959 Fender Precision Bass. You’re 61 B-15N is a lot more valuable than the 66. Chances are the 66 is a single baffle reflex cabinet where the speaker is mounted to the outer baffle( you should check inside the box to confirm this) The Fender Marcus Miller is just a pretty common bass. Just my take however.
Thank you for responding. Yes, the 61 is a double baffle which sounds magical to me.
 
Fair points, especially the shipping aspect with the amp. The Ampeg appeals to recording session players and studios, and they always will. Has little to do with boomers.

The Fender MM and the Roscoe Beck sigs alone, disprove your point about holding value, though. Cheers.
But which Ampeg? the 61 or 66? you can't, rather, factor out the collector base. There are far fewer studios or session players than boomers and Xers. And the studio/session players will pivot to the 61 double baffle.

imo, the younger generation will care only for DI boxes and their Macs. Not some 100lb cab/head. they can get that sound from an sgt di.

You only have a short window to sell off your 60s eq...again, in imo, to the boomer/xer collector.

And they will aim for what they can afford. I speak for myself as I am that age and collecting. If the 66 is cheaper than the 61? well...

as far as the Fender signature, I have no data to back up my statement. I just recall the Fender Sting model being about $800 in the early 2000s and reverb has them selling btw $700-1200. I cannot speak for Rosco or Marcus. Neither appeal to me.

If I were to have the ear of the OP, I would say no trade.

But secretly telling him to sell me the 66.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lofreakwencee
I wouldn't make that trade....but i have more basses i love then time to play them....and i gig with a replica b15. Since you have 2? Maybe. Since you felt you needed to ask, the right answer is No.
 
Last edited: