I have an xavier tele for my soon and it is pretty good. I wish they offered these in a non aged version.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
![]()
It wasn't the drugs that screwed up people's heads back then; it was dealing with all those knobs...
Now I'm curious what all the controls do.
Try being in Canada. Our Dollar's so low right now that a Slick or GFS anything would be the price of a used MIM or new Squier CV. lolView attachment 776968 Well, the SL57 recieved a Guitar Player editors pick, but it is basically the closest thing they have to a standard Strat.
The coolest color they had (Black ash, pictured) has been discontinued. The scale, nut width, and radius, ARE listed for the guitars. I imagine the bass listings will be updated shortly.
I've yet to see one in the wild, and there are so many playable guitars in this price range... I find it hard to justify ordering one, especially a bass.
The bridge is pretty glaring though. Why is there a shiny bridge on an instrument where everything else is "aged".
Yeah. these are definitely not true-reliced, but they're not bad. What appears to be slightly copper colored hardware generally fools the eye at first. I just don't know why they couldn't have done like AXL Badwater basses and at least make all the hardware equally fake-cheezy-reliced.Good point. I think the answer might be that these Slick SLPB basses are not so much "reliced" as they are "half-reliced" -- or "half-ass-reliced." Still an interesting looking item for someone who might want to do a little DIY work to finish up the relicing, or even not bother at all, and just play the thing.
I just don't know why they couldn't have done like AXL Badwater basses and at least make all the hardware equally fake-cheezy-reliced...
I played the earlier AXL p-bass'ish model (discontinued IIRC) and wasn't impressed, but it at least shows what can be done at the price point. I'm also a bit suspicious about the Slick headstock for which there appear to be no close-up pictures. It might be satin, but it looks oddly un-abused compared to the rest of the bass.
If they could take the Slick and give it the hardware and headstock finish of the AXL, they'd have a much more convincing package.
Possibly. The hardtail style bridges on the guitars don't look quite as shiny. However, except for a few aged screws and picukpsMaybe this is Round 1, beta testing. We'll see better relicing and cheaper hardware on the next round.
Maybe this is Round 1, beta testing. We'll see better relicing and cheaper hardware on the next round.
I think what we have here is a bass that doesn't quite know what it's trying to be.
Even the pickups are bespoke "Slick" designs, hand aged and magnetically degaussed to create the "sag" so desired in vintage pickups.
That's some interesting market-speak. The pickups are magnetically demagnetized? Huh?
Keep in mind that these are ostensibly designed by Earl Slick, who is himself medium-relic'd and aged with random shiny bits stuck on.