TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I haven't experienced this with trying strings on my bass.
I agree with Chris on this, when it comes to steel strings anyway. I had a dead Spiro Mit E next to a particularly-dead set of Sprio Weichs (got everything used, so I'm unsure if they were 4/4 or 3/4) and the weak E I always felt on the Weichs was gone, with a more balanced feel and projection still while still being relatively low tension. I really liked the sound of that set, overall.
I agree with Chris on this, when it comes to steel strings anyway. I had a dead Spiro Mit E next to a particularly-dead set of Sprio Weichs (got everything used, so I'm unsure if they were 4/4 or 3/4) and the weak E I always felt on the Weichs was gone, with a more balanced feel and projection still while still being relatively low tension. I really liked the sound of that set, overall.
Some strings, like Velvets have low action and matched tension. I need them higher, but I have little to no E drop off on either on my old bass or new bass. For me, it's my favorite thing about Velvet strings. Very balanced sounding and feeling. I'd be worried a significantly heavier tension E might throw that balance, and feel weird without having the desired effect.
Something I've noticed in the past is that 4/4 Sprio solos also have matched tension string-to-string (although IIRC the E has a pound or two more) and a similar overall tension to Velvets. I wonder if the same principal would apply, at least when it comes to string to string balance in projection?
Except for that G spiro- can't do it. wish I could. It's a gut up top for me!I feel like string hell always leads back to a full set of spirocores/ or flexocores.