TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Good chance Bergantino is just being more honest than some others on the list ? Also the closed cab set up of the Berg is to achieve that certain tone goal, at usually the sacrafice of low end range, so given that the Berg 610 does dam good considering it's unported.The Berg doesn't have the most impressive specs but I guess it's one of those don't judge a book by it's cover' moments aye.
I own the Epifani UL610, but have not played through the Bergantino NV610, so take my explanation with a grain of salt.
From what I understand, the NV610 "New Vintage 610" is a take on the old school Ampeg sealed 810 cabinets, but with more focus, clarity, and volume.... (and mids to spare, but no tweeter.)
The Epifani UL610 does something completely different. This is a modern hi-fi speaker cabinet with tons of lows and highs (and a wonderful tweeter.) The mids are there, just different, not the Rock N Roll mids of cut and doom, buth the UL can be eq'ed similarly, but from what I understand, not the same.
I hope this helps, and maybe someone who has experience with both will come along and add their 2 bits.
If going by specs alone, it seems that the Epifani and Eden cabs would be better than the Bergantino (which is winning by a large margin at this point)..Interesting..

Seriously folks, I can't believe this poll indicates anything. I'd like to know how many of those who have voted have based their opinion on actually using more than one or two of the listed cabs. Very few I would bet.
Am I wrong?

Are there 3 separate chambers (2-10's each) on the Berggie?