I feel that I can state with confidence that calling any recently released album the "most significant recorded milestone for jazz bass since the Evans trio "Sunday at the Village Vanguard" is ridiculous.
If you prefer the solo styles of Scott LaFaro and George Mraz, then your taste leans toward more lyrical playing (which is what I think you really mean by your phrase "melodic freedom"). OK, then what about Michael Moore, Marc Johnson, Charlie Haden, IEddie Gomez, Niels Pederson, Dave Holland, Red Mitchell and many other players who play what would be great melodies on any instrument.
To disregard the artistry or "significance" of these great bassists strikes me as rather ignorant. Also, it seems to me that the term "pitch drumming" is malevolently dismissive of a great many terrific players. Could it be that you just don't like the sound of the bass?
I certainly didn't mean to be offensive. I will try to better express what I am hoping to say...
"Pitch-drumming" is neither an original phrase, nor intended as a judgment. I used it to be descriptive, not dismissive or "malevolent" in any way. I think it objectively describes our role in a jazz rhythm section.
When we read about American musical history we learn about "banned" or forbidden African music and instruments (especially drums) during slave times. We learn about the creative substitution of Western instruments, tonality, and forms to meet the cultural need of the oppressed.
Jazz comes out of this history. In traditional African music, "talking drums" (pitch drums) are routine. Our musical role, when we walk, or vamp, is an updated version of pitch drumming.
As far as, "...Michael Moore, Marc Johnson, Charlie Haden, Eddie Gomez, Niels Pederson, Dave Holland, Red Mitchell and many other players who play what would be great melodies on any instrument..." I couldn't agree more! I know and appreciate their playing, have many of their discs, and try to listen, learn, and grow. All tremendous players! And what about the newer players? Tony Falanga, Scott Colley, etc.?
I said that only a few players go beyond being a "talking drum" in their solos. All of these great bassists, and many more, are part of that group of select few.
That said, most of these great musicians are, still, essentially "reworking cleared land" in terms of their basic approach and overall concept (IMHO). To my musical orientation, none of their solo work represents a huge conceptual leap from pre-established approaches, post La Faro.
I know their playing and can comment on it. Do you know Terry's? Have you heard the album I mentioned? I would respectfully suggest that you listen to that disc, then consider my statement. i will personally send you a copy, out of goodwill...(PM'ing you now for your snail mail address).
I view Terry's playing as a significant step forward because he is approaching the bass significantly differently as a soloist. By playing arco, with the technical freedom, articulations, and motivic creativity of a great horn player, he is doing something groundbreaking.
I love the bass' sounds, and arco is a big part of what the bass can do. The arco "voice" is simply a totally different approach, in jazz. Many folks have tried it, over the years. He is the only one I have seen/heard pull it off with great tone, running 8th note freedom, and grace. Who else can do all of this?
You asked for help. You wrote," I don't need help thinking of a ton of great bass solos. I just thought it would be interesting, thought-provoking and, um, fun to solicit other bassist's ideas. Perhaps someone might mention something I either haven't heard or have forgotten about. Neither thing has happened yet, but it might. Feel free not to contribute if you don't feel like it."
In response, I offer a visionary player, who you may not have been aware of, who has advanced the jazz bass solo concept in a big way. From your response, I am guessing that I did provide something with which you were unfamiliar.
Best,
Eric