TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I should probably fold after hearing that, but I'll bluff and raise you this:
Regarding bass tone, I think you hit the nail on the head. Victor, Stanley, whoever always sound like themselves in technique, phrasing, attitude, and of course, in a very general way, tone. However, the instrument IMO does have an impact, and Victor sounds a bit different on every bass I've heard him play. Even his various similarly spec'd Fodera's sound a touch different to me.
I feel that while my basic tone comes through everything I play, the Celinder sounds SO different from the Alleva that there's no way any player would sound identical across those two instruments. Also, the voicing of each bass IMO and IME makes me play just a smidge differently (i.e., the huge low end and Marcus sizzle of the Celinder versus the very warm, growly vintage mid voicing of the Alleva).
This is pretty much 'it' for me at this point. I've gone from the 'active soapbar uber modern thing' all the way back to a passive J type slap tone. While I still use active J's, I pretty much set the preamps flat (maybe just a touch of bass boost) and my relatively even, full range rig virtually flat, with a touch of upper mids (1K or so) dialed out to reduce the gank (I hear a lot of that harsh 'gank' in the Graham clip posted above, but I still dig it).
I still love Marcus's slap tone, but it's almost impossible to drive that huge, wide, active tone into the audience with just backline IMO.
Funny with the Music Man slap tone. I used to live for that, and played one all through the late 70's and 80's. At this point, the old classic J tone sounds, well, 'classic' to me, while the MM slap tone (ala Louis J) sounds wonderful, but somehow 'dated'. Of course, pure IMO there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rek3g8znpOg

Hey guys! Fun discussion.
First, lot's of threads on this. Marcus Miller never used a Sadowsky pre. I believe his original pre was some sort of 'Star preamp' or something that Roger installed in his J bass (hence the Sadowsky confusion). I believe his current bass has a pretty standard Bartolini pre in it, but not sure. I have read that the Sadowsky pre was at least voiced to mimic Marcus's original preamp.
Regarding bass tone, I think you hit the nail on the head. Victor, Stanley, whoever always sound like themselves in technique, phrasing, attitude, and of course, in a very general way, tone. However, the instrument IMO does have an impact, and Victor sounds a bit different on every bass I've heard him play. Even his various similarly spec'd Fodera's sound a touch different to me.
I stand corrected, sort of...in that Marcus Miller's first preamp was a Bartolini installed by Roger Sadowsky, however Roger then designed his preamp to sound very much like the one he installed in Marcus' bass with according to Marcus "some subtle differences which he (Roger) thinks makes the pre-amp more useful".
I do feel that the parts of an instrument and electronics contribute to tone, but not as much as the tone generated from the player. I started on an acoustic instrumt (trumpet) and even today many players will refer to the sound of a particular beand or style of an axe but always speak of the tone of an individual as something more personal. I've heard great jazz players descvribe the tones of acoustic piano players such as Bud Powell, Art Tatum, or Herbie Hancock even. Even though they all played different brands of instruments, one never said one brand contributed to that person's "tone". Ok we understand that to be true for acoustic instruments and that electronic instruments have more influence over the character of a person's tone, be it electric bass, guitar, synth (especially), or other electronic instruments. However, electric bass' electronics, to my ear, do effect the tone but not overall. Therefore I agree that I can too detect the differences in different brands of basses, but I always listen for a person's tone to shine through. For instance, I heard Louis Johnson recently warming up for a gig and was using some cheap bass, but he still sounded and reminded me of the Louis with the MM stingray he helped make popular. The tone was similar, not a MM tone, but a Louis Johson-in-yo-face kind of tone. Even when he used Alembics, his tone was similar, but with an Alembic color. So by my standards I tend to think of tone as the inherent sound a person puts out and then that is filtered thru his particular type or brand of instrument. So we agree that Victor Wooten's basses all sound different and that any player may sound the same on different instruments, however I firmly believe that tone is in the way a person projects that sound, thus meaning that I think that a Stradivarius is just a Stradivarius and a fender jazz is just a jazz.
Doesn't that just put a smile on your face all the way around... feel, tone, groove, intensity, joy, time, etc. I'm not even in the same universe, but on the rare occasions that I do use the slap technique on a gig now (music is changing VERY quickly at this point), that's the inspiration I draw on anyway.
There are some guys here in Detroit (I've lived here about 4 years now) that I have the honor of knowing who are at this level, and I can't believe I get to hang with them (including our own TBers Mikebass and Shelly).