Rodent said:accuracy and consistency are the two driving factors that more than offset the added work required.
+1
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Rodent said:accuracy and consistency are the two driving factors that more than offset the added work required.
illidian said:I like the extra bulge of the open strings - that's when I use them, for that extra boost.
I can't believe no one has mentioned this builder doesn't sound like Roger Sadowsky (who Mike told us would be getting all of his business)! Of course we can expect Mike to use the Sadowsky pick-ups and pre-amp, but this seems sacrilege!
BigMikeW said:LOL Roger is still getting my business! However, I can't pass up the opportunity to be a part of developing a new bass line with a manufacturer. Believe me that ALL the things I like about Sadowsky's, Lull's, Lakland's and Warwick's are going to influence how things are made. January NAMM 2006.
BigMikeW said:Believe me that ALL the things I like about Sadowsky's, Lull's, Lakland's and Warwick's are going to influence how things are made. January NAMM 2006.
any MTD american bass, most Elricks I've seen alsomat gregory said:hmm interesting thread , has anybody got a pic of a bass with a zero fret????
lowphatbass said:I'm not a big fan of the zero fret. In my bass playing I sometimes like to take advantage of that open string "zing", it's not by design verbally course, but playing off of the NUT gives me some extra "B@LLS" and it really works in some situations. There's something about using the full speaking length of a string coupled with the nut surface that's buried into the end of the neck that really "takes it home". If that sound isn't right for the situation than I'm dropping it on the 5th fret of the string below.
to the sound. I am not sure that I understand.extra "B@LLS"
maybe its like using a brass nut, because its metal gives it more oomf?Mike Dimin said:Please explain to me how using a nut as a witness point as opposed to using a zero fret as a witness point gives to the sound. I am not sure that I understand.
Mike
i_got_a_mohawk said:is the zero fret just a fret at the point where the nut would be on most basses, pushing the but back a bit so instead of being open the strings are always down over the fret or something ?
Good point, Phil. I have no idea which wears faster. My thought was that zero-fret might result in less maintenance: the nut becomes a spacer, so it doesn't have to be cut perfectly for height; less to worry about if switching from light to heavy gauge strings or vice versa.Philbiker said:isn't the zero fret a maintenance issue? A zero fret's going to wear faster than a nut, right?
I was just thinking it probably depends on the nut material. I personally prefer a "bone" nut (the white plasticky material) over than brass or graphite, maybe the "bone" nut actually wears faster than a "zero fret" would.Fuzzbass said:Good point, Phil. I have no idea which wears faster.