• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

ZERO FRET?

Mike Dimin said:
The contact point of the string is a fret rather than the nut. It makes the witness point much more accurate, helping your bass to play in better tune. Additionally, open strings have the same timbre as the fretted note. I just dont see why changing the type of witness point dramatically changes the sound and gives more "b@lls" to the sound.

Mike
I couldn't give you the exact physics behind why playing off of a nut dramatically changes the sound, and it may not be THAT dramatic. As you mentioned, the timbre is different. Maybe it's the difference in material and the fact that the string is being terminated around part of it's diameter, and not just resting on a flat surface, I really don't know. Open strings do have a different flavour on different basses but it always seems to be a "live" spot.
I need to admit that I get really "mental" about my equipment and playing so some of what I "hear" may actually be what I see and feel, but if I think a note is going to jump off the neck, and I want it to, it probably will, that could be where the extra b@lls is coming from.
 
mat gregory said:
hmm interesting thread , has anybody got a pic of a bass with a zero fret????

Rickenbacker 4001 C64S with zero fret: :cool:
 

Attachments

  • 4001C64sZero Fret.jpg
    4001C64sZero Fret.jpg
    30.7 KB · Views: 75
I don't think there is enough market regarding this seemingly small detail to warrant a lot of fuss over it (however I may be wrong, hence the existance of this thread) but I'll submit an opinion nonetheless.

I've always noticed a difference when playing fretted and open on any instrument I've played. The sound is a little "different" on instruments with a "regular" style nut vs. a zero fret. The Steinbergers I've owned did seem to be more closely matched to the fretted sound, IIRC. I really notice this on my Dingwall. It's an older one with a zero fret. Due to the distance it is from the "nut" that is actually a string guide, it threw my playing off at first when I initially got it. I like having the sound similarity, and I think Lowphat will agree, Dingwalls have plenty down where it counts!

My question is, how can one get more of that b@llsy tone when fretting? The only thing that changes when you fret a string (besides scale length at that moment) is you introduce your finger onto the other side of the fret. It would seem that one's finger could introduce some sound absorbtion (due to dampening of the rapid stretching and releasing of the string) because it is soft and not a hard, fixed object attached to the neck. I don't ever use a capo, but a good, solid capo should come close to reproducing the sound of the nut/0-fret. I notice the decay when I'm fretting is much sooner than an open note, yet the sound of the string is still closer to when it is open. Thoughts on this?

I guess, if this is a feature that will cause someone to or not to buy a bass, they should probably go custom.
 
I love a zero fret! I have one on my Trace Elliot T-Basses!! As far as how they look on a Jazz bass. I think it looks killer. I use a T-Bass as my main bass.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

As far as tone, my bass sounds way better than yours, and yours, and yours :p . Listen to the clip. This is into an Aphex Punch factory and into my Mac and GarageBand. Both knobs full on, EQ flat on the bass. Nothing added in Garage Band. The slap sound is sick. This thing absolutely smokes a Sadowsky - no matter where it was made. Oh, this is the blue one by the way.

Click [Invalid or Expired Link Removed] for the clip.
 
¤ sigh ¤
Looks:
Nobody but the player will notice the zero fret - if even he does... If the distance between the nut (the sideways control) is short, why even think about it?

Tone:
Distinction. That is what the zero fret gives. The tone is more accurate, has more fundamental and sustain. Simply because of the material, the exact string height and the proper location (if it's built properly, of course).
A double-acting nut (both sideways control and witness point) will add the following: missfit to the string, both sideways and at the bottom; differences between the string in string height; variation in material from other witness points; lenghtwise misplacement, which impairs intonation; et al. Not that all will be on every piece, but they will all come at one time or another, in unpredictable combinations. Even though the build process is state of the art.

Tone is more complete, more accurate, lively and sutained with a zero fret.

Seems that "B@LLSY" means wooly or something. :confused:



Fretless? Well, that depends on the relief. With a true flat board, you need a minor ridge at the top, to give the string some space to move. With more relief, you could actually let the string rest on the edge of the fingerboard (if it's hard enough).
 
Suburban said:
? sigh

Tone:
Distinction. That is what the zero fret gives. The tone is more accurate, has more fundamental and sustain. Simply because of the material, the exact string height and the proper location (if it's built properly, of course).
A double-acting nut (both sideways control and witness point) will add the following: missfit to the string, both sideways and at the bottom; differences between the string in string height; variation in material from other witness points; lenghtwise misplacement, which impairs intonation; et al. Not that all will be on every piece, but they will all come at one time or another, in unpredictable combinations. Even though the build process is state of the art.

Tone is more complete, more accurate, lively and sutained with a zero fret.

Seems that "B@LLSY" means wooly or something. :confused:
From you're statement it's possible that "B@LLSY" could mean incomplete, inaccurate and lethargic.
You know my bass, or basses, don't seam to suffer any symptoms of this "double-acting nut disease" you speak of. Things like great intonation and good sustain are so important, I have to believe that if they could be improved significantly by using a zero fret we would see many more zero frets in use today.
I could understand these problems you mentioned cropping-up during the construction process, and see how the use of a zero fret could give more consistant results, but if the traditional nut design left so much to be desired then I doubt so many top luthiers would bother using it.
 
lowphatbass said:
if the traditional nut design left so much to be desired then I doubt so many top luthiers would bother using it.
'Tradition', my friend, is an extremely heavy argument in guitar design - and even more in sales!
'Technical advantages' is not....

Also note, that anything well done is good enough, zero fret or 'd-a' nut. Anything badly done...well, you follow.
 

Latest posts