My bar band's singer wanted to do an AI flyer for us a few months ago. I put my foot down and said absolutely not. I'm not TOTALLY anti-AI, it has some legitimate uses. But generally what you see is people using it as a substitute for thinking or for actual creative work. It's the underlying ethos; if we want to tell people there's something special about hearing actual musicians actually play music, rather than a DJ or even just a Spotify playlist, then why outsource our promotion to a robot? AI is a lot better now than a year or two ago, the six-finger thing is getting less common. But all these bands running AI flyers of themselves all wind up looking the same, precisely because they ARE doing it the lazy, easy way.
So I whipped up a flyer myself. Took me half an hour, using some pics from a venue photographer back during bike week the previous year.
View attachment 7543612
Your flyer looks like everyone else's, like most of the ones I've made and very similar to the AI flyer.
Unlike AI, I tried to find our uncoolest photos to make this one:
The first AI take:
Talk about false advertising...there are 4 of us and we were calling ourselves a trio?!? That was DI (Drummer Intelligence).
I don't see it as being that different from using a template. It's not art, it's a notice. It's a small town, old guy cover band, not our full time jobs. The list of short cuts I take is long. Are the 42 facebook scrollers that might see this really judging our integrity based on this? Do I need to hand draw each one an carefully place it on random windshields to be authenic?
Quick test--AI or ni (nutdog intelligence)? Ethical or not? It got 8 likes on facebook, so consider your answer carefully. The fate of live music depends on it.
I wasn't thinking about an AI morality debate when I posted. I just thought it was interesting that, over time, without prompting, AI made 'artistic choices' that made the drummer and me conform to 'ideal' beauty standards. It must have learned that from humans.