Another guy that's pretty much unknown, but still really good, is Danny Wilson. He played with Jeff Lorber (in the late 70s I think).
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
j-raj said:....Or on John McLaughlin's Que Alegria and Live at the Royal Festival Hall.
I distinctly remember him on the live album about to launch into a solo with a barrage of 16th on an open string before he opened a can of whoop-ass... Oh, yeah he was gigging on a double necked headless David King at that time...![]()
JMX said:I'm pretty sure he played his Schack doubleneck.

j-raj said:....Or on John McLaughlin's Que Alegria and Live at the Royal Festival Hall.
I distinctly remember him on the live album about to launch into a solo with a barrage of 16th on an open string before he opened a can of whoop-ass... Oh, yeah he was gigging on a double necked headless David King at that time...![]()
JMX said:Here is a bad pic. But I played that bass a few years ago in a German store (he sold it). He also played Clover graphite-neck basses and a Peter Coura fretless 5 back then.
He just recently started to use Hotwires.
ebozzz said:Know anything about that Danny Wilson fella Jim?![]()
Kid Charlemagne said:What I find a bit curious is that you in a way seem to measure funkiness in the level of technical complexity that a players' basslines contain.

Bruce Lindfield said:Oh - I've been saying all through that he is one of the funkiest players ever and his feel is incredible and he plays some great lines.
But it is very different from a Jaco,Willis, Oteil fast 16th note funk lines,
Bruce Lindfield said:That is exactly the opposite of what I have been saying throughout this thread!!
I will copy some of my previous posts in this thread below, to illusttate that what you suggest is not what I have been saying...
Jacob Bartfield said:I'm not going to deny what you're saying. He was "the first" in a lot of ways, and he had a huge influence on most of the other bassists that people have mentioned. I just don't quite put him in the category of a 16th note funk bass player. It's true that he was funky, and played a lot of 16th notes, but when I hear the term "16th note funk", I think of a bass line made of almost all16th notes, which Jamerson's bass lines usually weren't.
Brad Johnson said:The trick with relentless 16ths is that it's not easy to do it AND be funky. While I love Jaco and Rocco, most of my favorite stuff by them has space. It breathes.
Bruce Lindfield said:I've got that album and have listened to it a lot - very funky, often slow - but not what I think of as 16th note finger funk...what do Jim and Brad think?
Bruce Lindfield said:I agree - I think lines with more space are far funkier - there's nothing like a groove with a lot of space and slight rhythmic displacements!
Whereas, the "relentless" thing can be very exciting to hear - but is usually less funky. I see these as two separate things. So - you either go for slower and funkier or faster, relentless bubbling lines that add excitement and energy to the music.
Brad Johnson said:Sorry, didn't see this question earlier.
I agree that we're not clear on the intent of this thread. If it's relentless 16ths, as I like to call it, Paul Jackson is the gray area. The guy plays with some of the hardest feel to cop that I've ever heard. I think Jim's post pointed out something that is key in respect to Jackson... it's not just the 16ths you play, it's the ones you don't. If that makes sense.
Because of PJ's uncanny feel you anticipate... at least I do. And what I anticipate is usually 16ths. .
ebozzz said:Know anything about that Danny Wilson fella Jim?![]()