... Hope this is still kosher
To the other judges, I think the fairest thing to do is commiserate publicly here (for transparency) about "acceptability standard" questions, and then vote. Since there are 5 of us, if we all vote we'll get a majority and then can set the standard. In cases where we don't all vote and there is a tie, maybe we can lean on @Chris Fitzgerald for a vote.
It might also be appropriate at times to talk with with our OP and esteemed moderator, @TroyK, about what his intent was with certain situations. Even though he's a contestant, at least personally I consider him a very reliable OP witness. But if there are different judge opinions about that I'm open for discussion. Again, transparency is a good thing.
Judges, what are your thoughts about this as a foundation?
gentle and fluffy!