• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

34" vs 35" scale. Can anyone really tell the difference?

I think when we discuss scale length, we really need to define use case. There are people here who only play the first few frets on the B string, and for those people almost anything will work providing the neck is properly constructed (looking at you, early Fender 5 strings) and a “normal” string gauge is used. It’s once you start playing up the neck do you start noticing the difference in scale length as the B string will sound more clearly as you ascend.

On my Dingwall, it stays clear well up to the 15th fret or so, with a .130 B. I remember having a hard time with 34” B strings getting odd overtones around the 10th fret fairly consistently using a .125 or .130. A .120 worked better, but there was a noticeable decrease in tension relative to the other strings.
 
I have 35, 34, 32, 30.7 basses. I have 24.75, 25.5 and 27” guitars and a 12.5” violin to boot. I will say in my experience I don’t notice the difference. Even if I switch directly from 30.7 to an unlined 34 fretless it doesn’t bug me. I think you just develop muscle memory for what you play. I also have no idea what my string spacing are. I know they aren’t the same. My 30.7 bass feels just like my 34” but it’s like there’s an extra fret if that makes sense. I know there is a difference and that some people prefer one or the other. That’s cool.
Yep.
I go from Double bass to fretless 34” to fretless 25” weekly. You don’t overthink it, you just play the instrument that suits the gig.
 
35's showed up because....string makers don't always make rational string sets for 5 string basses - the B string is usually far too skinny, and therefore floppy. As a reaction, bass makers started making their basses slightly longer - which increases the tension of ALL the strings, (not a complete fix by any means). Some folks like the longer scale, I see it as a band aid for a problem that's solved by getting the right strings - I often buy 4 string sets and a single B (of greater diameter than what would come with a 5 string set) so the set has the same tension, and I'm good.

I play a lot without looking at my fingers (I sometimes practice before a gig with my eyes closed), and having 4's and 5's with the same scale length makes that easier, particularly as the one 4 string I have left is a fretless.
 
A lot of what you feel has to do with how well the bass is balanced on your body. I have an F bass BN5 which is a 34.5" scale. Because of the extended horn and strap button placement, the bass plays smaller then my 34" Fender Jazz. I personally think the 34.5 scale makes a huge difference in the low B. I had a Lakland 5 that was 35" scale and I couldn't hang.
 
As many have already stated, I have basses ranging from short scale to medium to full (34) to long (35). I think the biggest issue is how the instrument hangs in 'playing position'. Some of my 35 inch scale instruments feel quite comfortable while others feel like quite a stretch (as does my 32.5 medium scale) because of how it hangs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jason Hollar
In all my years of selling basses, this happens most consistently:

I post a 35" scale bass. I get a comment saying, "If this bass was 34-inch scale, I'd be all over it." A little while later, I sell a 34" scale bass and get the comment, " Man! If this was 35-inch scale, we'd be talking."

I own both. I play both... in 4-string and 5-string. Scale-length has never crossed my mind when switching from a 34" to a 35". I've never noticed any need to adjust. For me, scale length isn't even in my top-10 of things I look for in a bass.

Can anyone REALLY tell the difference between 34" scale and 35" scale? If so, what's the deal? Does it affect your playing? Is it all about how the low-B sounds?

I don't get it. Enlighten me. :meh:

(don't get me started on multi-scale... lol)

I can tell the difference and I don't like 35"
 
I'm 6'4" and have large hands so the reach hasn't been a problem. I have a G&L L-2500 and although it's nice, the B does seem to suffer a bit compared to my 35" Warmoth Gecko. The Gecko, though, has a five piece neck and considerably more mass. It's B is great and continues to sound good the farther I go up the neck. I have a Ibanez BTB which also has a five piece 35" neck and the B is superior to the G&L. Many 34" basses I've tried tend to sound kind of dull and clunky on the B and E higher up the neck, but, of course, that may just be the particular instrument and not the general rule. I'd like to play more basses that are 34" with laminated necks to see if it's really the scale length and not the overall construction, but I don't live in a place that offers a lot of opportunity to do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jason Hollar
In all my years of selling basses, this happens most consistently:

I post a 35" scale bass. I get a comment saying, "If this bass was 34-inch scale, I'd be all over it." A little while later, I sell a 34" scale bass and get the comment, " Man! If this was 35-inch scale, we'd be talking."

I own both. I play both... in 4-string and 5-string. Scale-length has never crossed my mind when switching from a 34" to a 35". I've never noticed any need to adjust. For me, scale length isn't even in my top-10 of things I look for in a bass.

Can anyone REALLY tell the difference between 34" scale and 35" scale? If so, what's the deal? Does it affect your playing? Is it all about how the low-B sounds?

I don't get it. Enlighten me. :meh:

(don't get me started on multi-scale... lol)
35" scale is great for the B string. Usually on the 34" scale, the B string feels a bit loose or floppy. With the 35" scale it has a lot more tension and feels better to me. Nonetheless, the one I have is a 34" scale 5-string.
 
I didn’t notice much of a difference until I got this Spector NS Dimension… the reach for a 37 inch B string feels like a football field away versus a 34
I’m getting used to it now and I also notice that “piano” tone much more than the 35s or 34s that I’ve played.
I understand why some people are drawn to a shorter scale for comfort reasons and even if there is a difference in tone, if you can’t play it without experiencing pain, it’s not worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jason Hollar