• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

3Leaf Audio Club - Episode 2

STU! I'm coming over to your house and stealing yours!

Funny that we both ended up ordering these...
Beware! I keep all my gear safe with a state-of-the-art double chihuahua security system.

I'm a big fan of the mk2, so I had to try out the new flavor. Great apes think alike!


Nice. What is your confirmation number?
#4370
 
My wife apparently had a Psycho Chihuahua sign in her room growing up. Now it's a running inside joke. To be fair, I had a Stussy and Makita girl poster that wasn't embarrassing at all.

1746026583575.png
 
Beware! I keep all my gear safe with a state-of-the-art double chihuahua security system.

I'm a big fan of the mk2, so I had to try out the new flavor. Great apes think alike!



#4370
No worries, I keep Snausages in my pocket for just such an occasion. And also because they're delicious.

I had a Mk2 until Eileen was born and daycare got expensive. I should have kept it and sold it now for $37k.

I look forward to sharing intel the next time we run into each other.
 
Octabvre 3.33 vs Octabvre 3 comparison:


Great comparison! MKIII and MK3.33 sound like completely different takes on the OC2 vibe. There's definitely a case to be made for having both on ones board. I'm loving the sound of sub soloed with tone set somewhere clockwise and "Overload" switched on--wow! (but that was in a different comparo vid)

BTW, I have the same Doom 2 and Octabvre colorways :thumbsup:

1746027456077.png
 
Last edited:
Octabvre 3.33 vs Octabvre 3 comparison:

Bravo for doing such a great comparison vid. You did exactly what was needed.
My take: With both tone knobs set fully CCW, the older Mk. 3 will probably sit better in a dense band mix. However, the new 3.33 seems to be able to get close to that sound a little higher into the tone knob’s range. If I were starting from scratch, I’d prefer the new 3.33. However, my Mk 3 sounds so good in a mix, I don’t have a desire to upgrade (yet).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ricky Caboverde
Octabvre 3.33 vs Octabvre 3 comparison:


Quick question: have you compared the Mk3.33 to your T16 yet? Thoughts 🙏


Bravo for doing such a great comparison vid. You did exactly what was needed.
My take: With both tone knobs set fully CCW, the older Mk. 3 will probably sit better in a dense band mix. However, the new 3.33 seems to be able to get close to that sound a little higher into the tone knob’s range. If I were starting from scratch, I’d prefer the new 3.33. However, my Mk 3 sounds so good in a mix, I don’t have a desire to upgrade (yet).

For sure! If you want to poke through, MkIII has gobs of mids to do that in spades, but Mk3.33 sounds like it can provide a deeper foundation that’s felt, like Moog-Subphatty-feel-it-in-your-chest (at least through my headphones). It’s all in the use case and how you want to “sit” in the mix.
 
Hey folks, I am toying with the idea of trading my big box Octabvre MkI for one of the newer MKIIIs, but was curious on whether this would be a good move. I'd like to save a bit of space on my board so the MKIII seems appealing from that standpoint. It seems like the big box ones are worth more currently, is that the consensus?