I'm sure that will sound just lovelyUse a 1x15 as a pedestal.![]()
Build a pretty box out of 1/4" plywood to set behind you on stage, then hide a vertical array of 15's with horns and a couple of 2x18 subs behind a curtain.


TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm sure that will sound just lovelyUse a 1x15 as a pedestal.![]()
Build a pretty box out of 1/4" plywood to set behind you on stage, then hide a vertical array of 15's with horns and a couple of 2x18 subs behind a curtain.


That was not my experience at a local festival this weekend. They had just bought a Mesa Big Block V12 and a matching 4x10 for the festival. I figured I'd save my back and leave my rig at the practice space this time. I've had bad experiences with this in the past, but I had originaly heard they were going to have an Ampeg SVT 8x10 rig. The Mesa rig farted out before I even started to crank the juice. Fortunately, the stage monitoring situation was excellent and it was a non-issue.The average 410 goes as low or lower than the average 115 and is noticeable louder.
So a 215 will usually get buried by an 810 as well.
Well 215's are usually oriented vertically, and that has a whole lot to do with why a 215 might have better dispersion than a 410. The 410 will have at least 20 inches, sometimes as much as 22" inches, so the mid dispersion in a vertical 215 will be better, though not by much, and probably not enough to make any appreciable difference.Ok that's what i thought. I guess i was being confusing, (late night shift about to start) since i'm tired. I was so much talking about volume, tone, response etc., but rather what i meant was
410:115::810:215
if that makes sense. So for the sake of the thread, it seemd to me like it was comparing apples to oranges. If you wanted to do a fair comparison of the dispersion, it seems misleading to say that a 215 may have better dispersion results vs. a 410 when in reality it is the "big brother" of the 15 cabs compared to a "little 10". Again this probably makes no sense and I'll laugh when i see it in the morning.
I'm sure that will sound just lovely
![]()
Accent on the USUALLY part, dude. You can build cabs to fart out at whatever freqs you wantThat was not my experience at a local festival this weekend. They had just bought a Mesa Big Block V12 and a matching 4x10 for the festival. I figured I'd save my back and leave my rig at the practice space this time. I've had bad experiences with this in the past, but I had originaly heard they were going to have an Ampeg SVT 8x10 rig. The Mesa rig farted out before I even started to crank the juice. Fortunately, the stage monitoring situation was excellent and it was a non-issue.
We'll see when I build my 2x Killomax 15 cabinet.
I might be off topic here, but it reminds me of a tale I was told many years ago. If you take a 1x15 with 4x10 combination and compare it to just two of the same spec ( 2x1x15 or 2x4x10) the two later configs will have a natural boost?? I don't remember the details but for some reason I've stuck to it blindly. Any thoughts?
Putting two identical cabinets side by side in the middle of a room is similar to putting one against a wall, and putting two identical cabinets against a wall is similar to putting one in a corner. My drummer thinks I am strange when I insist on putting my cabinets in a corner though.
I understand his concern completely, and sympathize. The trumping of function by form is what happens when the design parameters of cabs are dictated by marketeers instead of engineers. OTOH cabs like the Genz-Benz Neox show that sound engineering practice need not be totally abandoned to conform with the cookie cutter mentality that permeates this industry.
The major problem with the 810 is beaming...mids and highs drop off considerably when you get off axis to it. Having said that, it's what I use most of the timei hear what you're saying. although i'm nowhere NEAR as educated on this stuff as you are, the more and more i read, the more i'm starting to realize the little nuances of sound and how it works. with that said though, wouldn't the 8x10 be kind of a stable(architecturally speaking) to how the sound disperses? since it, in essence, is 2 stacks of 4 10s?
The major problem with the 810 is beaming...mids and highs drop off considerably when you get off axis to it. Having said that, it's what I use most of the time![]()
Trust me, I've heard both.
But in general, the 410 will bury a 115 with an equivalent quality driver in volume, and can be designed to go just as low as a 115.

