Personally I've never needed much more than 300 watts into 4 ohms. Right now I'm running a 500 watt combo and it's fine. Unless you're playing stadiums, get the one that sounds better.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I couldn't have said it any better. I'm too old for this stuff. I have a 200 Watt combo and it usually stays home. I usually play a 50 Watt combo with Line Out to the PA system. No problems being heard or felt.I'mma go out on a limb and say that any place you play that you think you'll need 900 watts for, will have you going direct and will hate your 900 watts anyway.
Double check the quotes you take from the web. A difference of 3dB when you’re getting 100 dB in the face, won’t pass unnoticed.quote:
"If you compare the maximum volume of a 50-watt amplifier with a 100-watt amplifier, the difference is only 3 dB, barely greater than the ability of the human ear to detect a difference. It would take an amplifier with 10 times more power (500 watts) to be perceived as being twice as loud—a 10 dB increase.
Keep this in mind when purchasing an amplifier or receiver"
https://www.lifewire.com/loudness-and-amp-power-3135081
The monitoring is great if you’re the headliner and get a real sound check. But for most of the bands just playing a throw-and-go set during the day the chance of getting useful bass monitoring in the wedges is slim to none. Also bass in the wedges can end up fighting your cabinet instead of adding to it, and that phenomenon is frequency dependent as well as a function of the distance between cab and monitor.I really don't see the need to go over 500. People are mentioning huge stages, festivals, etc. but don't those gigs (for the small minority of us lucky enough to play that type of show) have ridiculous FOH (and stage) sound de rigueur? 99.9% of the gigs people are doing are in front of less than 200 people.
I got a 900 watter, it was the only model Darkglass had at the time. I have come nowhere near 10 ‘o’ clock on the volume knob, but it also doesn’t break a sweat and sounds great doing it. The DI also sounds phenomenal
Hello, I imagine this topic comes up a lot, but I’ll ask anyway. I’m looking at two bass heads, and there is a 500 and 900 watt option. Realistically, what type of scenario would require the extra headroom of the 900 watt head? Or is it more about being able to drive multiple cabinets? Or both? I’m a fairly new player so I’m not as experienced with these things. Thanks!
The monitoring is great if you’re the headliner and get a real sound check. But for most of the bands just playing a throw-and-go set during the day the chance of getting useful bass monitoring in the wedges is slim to none. Also bass in the wedges can end up fighting your cabinet instead of adding to it, and that phenomenon is frequency dependent as well as a function of the distance between cab and monitor.
It’s always better if I can avoid cluttering up my monitor with bass. The monitor is for everything else besides my bass.
I’m looking at Darkglass actually…. I’ve heard a ton of demos on the distorted tones, but it’s scant out there on clean tone. What’s your take on it? Can it get warm, and can it do that clean growl too, or is it flat and cold?
Gets plenty loud.No worries, I got by with way under 500 watts for decades with my GK400RB !