Back in 1968 2x15's was the defacto larger rig...Back in 1995a 4x10 and a 1x15 was the defacto larger rig.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Back in 1968 2x15's was the defacto larger rig...Back in 1995a 4x10 and a 1x15 was the defacto larger rig.
An 810 is not necessarily seeledI'd choose 8x10 cause it's sealed and works good with tubers
I’ve got one Classic 15. How is it running 2 of them?
Good to know in case I need a bigger rig at some point...I like the 2 cabinets. They're easier to move than a 2x15 cabinet and offer a really thick and focused sound. I bought both of these used, and the first one had a Legend speaker that a previous owner had installed. I upgraded the second cabinet to a Legend as well, so with both, it adds another 200 watts of power handling. I comfortably use my PF-800 amp to power them. Other than the largest venues, there aren't too many places that the pair of cabinets won't cover.
I can't think of a much worse match than a 4x10 with a 1x15. It's not so much driver size, it's driver quantity. Assuming all other things are equal, a 115 will reach its limit well before the 410. A 210 is a better match for a 115 if you must mix driver sizes.