TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
have you tried looking inside there might be a trim for the blend?
Yup... that phaser was so close to perfect... but not quite. I replaced it with a Maxon PT-9 pro+ and haven't looked back yet![]()
Have you tried the EHX Flanger Hoax yet? It has a million different modes, but one of them is just a straight phaser with no flanging going on. I've done quite a lot of tweaking around with this pedal, mostly on synth rather than bass, but it can get as thick and effected as you want. Plus it has separate 100% dry, 100% wet, and blend (knob-controlled) outputs.
Have you thought about the Effectrode Phaseomatic?
Maybe the George Dennis Phaser?
Could Toadworks mod the Phantasam for ya to be thicker, a small outfit should be up for custom work.

Ah shame, you wouldn't think it'd be so hard to find a great phazer, I thought the Phantasm was gonna be incredible, but said I'd wait it out, lucky, I guess.![]()
Ok, this is something I was afraid of. Now when I say I hate the MXR Blowtorch, it isn't that big of a deal because there are others who love it and you get both sides. But considering I'm the only TBer to post about the Phantasm (and maybe the only one to own one - mine is serial number 10) I don't want every reference on this pedal to be, "oh somebody tried it out and said it sucks on bass".
It doesn't suit my needs. But that doesn't mean it won't work for other people. Again, very tweakable, a sweet sounding phase tone and zero noise, not to mention the ACD and ACS controls which are very cool.
I look at it the same way I look at the EMMA DiscomBOBulator. Great sound, but not a wet enough filter for me. But others like it because it "lets more of their actual tone through". I'd look at the Phantasm the same way. It can do the "For the Love of Money" sound just fine. And someone that wants a funky phase sound that doesn't overtake their clean sound completely, it could be just the thing.
But my preferences are just different. I'm not a "touch of phase/chorus/filter/grit" type of player. I'm more of a "holy crap, what did he just step on?" kind of guy. And the PH-350 is much closer to that for me.
Nope, nothing to be afraid of, I wouldn't just take someones advice randomly, you went into great detail describing it, and its exactly what I don't want in a phazer, I'm looking for a deep heavy, agressive, thick sound with one, kinda Larry Graham meets doom/sludge metal, mabye with a cutting high end too, but that wouldn't matter if I can get the rest. The "holy crap" idea sounds more in line with what I want. The Boss one, the more I mess with it the less I can find in this direction, seems to ruin my distortion too.
Step phasing- how about the Studio Electronics ModMax?
I got a second chance with my old guitar player's Infinitphase. Not good for classic phase tones, big and bulky and complicated but man what a fun thing to play around with.
Mutron Phasor II
Glad you enjoyed it.
These things are pretty much identical to a single Biphase channel - for some reason you left the Biphase off your list.![]()
But more importantly, what are the chances of the Infinitphase coming back?
are you trying the old EHX polyphase or the new Stereo Polyphase?
the new one was designed by Mike Beigel (Mutron pedals designer) and L Sound (dude who repairs and calibrates Mutrons).
I own it and think it can get pretty thick.