This is inspired by this thread: http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=650439
Fenders are the standard for the instrument and very common and very loved. Punk and metal are the genres that are the ones that are most "selling rebellion". Of course they shun the "norm". As indicated by the original post, there is an observable disparity in the occurrence of Fenders in these genres. I think there are valid considerations of psychology here.
Also, I consider the age of Metal to be 1976-81.
In any genre, you have brief underground beginnings. Iron Maiden did not grow up listening to heavy metal. It didn't exist. They grew up listening to Tull, Yes, The Who,Hendrix, Cream and Wishbone Ash. Sabbath and Purple and Blue Cheer were not considered 'Metal'.
As soon as you have people making Heavy metal bands because they grew up listening to heavy metal bands, the genre is inbred and wrecked and creatively watered down. The same is true of genres in any art form- painting, writing, photography, etc...
So after 1981 (coincidentally about the time Mtv appeared?), people were making Radio-friendly and Mtv-friendly metal. It was more about appearance than sound. Even the supposed anti-Mtv bands (still, just a backlash) were dressing up.
Look at the people who made heavy metal, Steve Harris, Burke Shelley, Bob Daisley, maybe Phil Lynot... back when the only "image" of Heavy Metal was jeans, a t-shirt and long hair- everyone played Fenders. Only Lemmy always played a Rick and Hawkwind were definitely not metal. Quick- one of you Priest fans find a concert picture of Ian Hill in 1974 or 76 and tell me what he's playing? Then show me a picture of him after Mtv appeared.
You wanna talk sound? Before "crunch" pedals, you only needed a Fender and an over-driven tube amp. Again, once gear was created to give you the "metal sound" - it was already over.
What do you think of that?
~Jimm
Fenders are the standard for the instrument and very common and very loved. Punk and metal are the genres that are the ones that are most "selling rebellion". Of course they shun the "norm". As indicated by the original post, there is an observable disparity in the occurrence of Fenders in these genres. I think there are valid considerations of psychology here.
Also, I consider the age of Metal to be 1976-81.
In any genre, you have brief underground beginnings. Iron Maiden did not grow up listening to heavy metal. It didn't exist. They grew up listening to Tull, Yes, The Who,Hendrix, Cream and Wishbone Ash. Sabbath and Purple and Blue Cheer were not considered 'Metal'.
As soon as you have people making Heavy metal bands because they grew up listening to heavy metal bands, the genre is inbred and wrecked and creatively watered down. The same is true of genres in any art form- painting, writing, photography, etc...
So after 1981 (coincidentally about the time Mtv appeared?), people were making Radio-friendly and Mtv-friendly metal. It was more about appearance than sound. Even the supposed anti-Mtv bands (still, just a backlash) were dressing up.
Look at the people who made heavy metal, Steve Harris, Burke Shelley, Bob Daisley, maybe Phil Lynot... back when the only "image" of Heavy Metal was jeans, a t-shirt and long hair- everyone played Fenders. Only Lemmy always played a Rick and Hawkwind were definitely not metal. Quick- one of you Priest fans find a concert picture of Ian Hill in 1974 or 76 and tell me what he's playing? Then show me a picture of him after Mtv appeared.
You wanna talk sound? Before "crunch" pedals, you only needed a Fender and an over-driven tube amp. Again, once gear was created to give you the "metal sound" - it was already over.
What do you think of that?
~Jimm