That’s what I was thinking! All the Thunderbirds I have played sound anything but muddy!
I'm starting to wonder if he misspelt "middy"
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That’s what I was thinking! All the Thunderbirds I have played sound anything but muddy!
Get a Dan electroHey guys I kinda like the muddy/dark Thunderbird sound when playing with a pick but hate the guitar's ergonomics. Is there another option that comes with two mud-buckers and better ergonomics? The Epiphone Embassy looks like it's gonna have less neck dive than the Thunderbird due to the longer upper-horn. Please lmk more, thanks!
View attachment 4449314 View attachment 4449314 View attachment 4449314
John Entwistle Himself actually said that this shape was very comfortable for Him!try these ergonomics lol Invalid Link Removed
lows minus mud
Nor are Thunderbirds.Danelectros aren't muddy.
Oddly, my two T Birds are anything but muddy. And as mentioned, don't have mudbuckers in them. But ergonomically, that Epi will indeed be the anti-Bird!
I agree with everyone who has said I never found T-birds to be muddy sounding.Hey guys I kinda like the muddy/dark Thunderbird sound when playing with a pick but hate the guitar's ergonomics. Is there another option that comes with two mud-buckers and better ergonomics? The Epiphone Embassy looks like it's gonna have less neck dive than the Thunderbird due to the longer upper-horn. Please lmk more, thanks!
View attachment 4449314 View attachment 4449314 View attachment 4449314
Also, my Gibson Tbird has no neck dive whatsoever. It is beautifully balanced, really light, has a slim fast neck and is rather quite versatile tone wise too. I have no idea where these negative assumptions come from.