I TOLD YOU SO... AGAIN!!!It happened to me with an Epifani UL502 compared to the Markbass LMII. After extensive testing through gigs and rehearsals, the LMII won me over.
Sorry, couldn't resist a bit of levity here...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I TOLD YOU SO... AGAIN!!!It happened to me with an Epifani UL502 compared to the Markbass LMII. After extensive testing through gigs and rehearsals, the LMII won me over.
I TOLD YOU SO... AGAIN!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sorry, couldn't resist a bit of levity here...![]()
T-Most, one other thing. I am a mature enough person that I have no need to make my bass the "equal" of Sadowsky. If the Sadowsky had blown away my Cort, fine. When I a/b'ed them, it just didn't happen that way. if you had a/b'ed them, you might have had an entirely different opinion. That would be cool with me too. What pissed me off is the notion that I am somehow wishing a result. I am not so hung up on my gear that I need to do something like that, and I am insulted that you suggested such a thing.![]()
Well it's unfortunate that you feel insulted. I don't see where I insulted you so I won't offer an apology. However, thats not to say basses can definately be better OR worse than the price tag suggests. I know this to be true. So, being the mature person you are take my humble opinion with a grain of salt and leave it at that. I just wonder why you are so upset that I dissagree with your evaluation.
Back OT tho, see, this is how it happens... someone who's not impressed by some more expensive basses creates a post that's critical of them, and then the lovers of those instruments get insulted, and pretty soon we have "give a damn" and "pissed me off", and pretty soon after that, a closed thread. Who the heck benefits from that???
I simply don't see the need to be critical of more expensive instruments any more than I would less expensive instruments.
If you love what you have, that's ALL that matters. You could be playing a Hondo II Wal-Mart special, or the most ridiculous gold plated 25,000 jewel encrusted beast. If you're inspired to play great music, IT'S FRIGGIN' WORTH IT for cryin' out loud.
It's about the MUSIC, not the MONEY!
Doesn't Cort use Warmoth parts?
![]()
Cheese, I luv ya, but yeah, I was.Vic, I hope you are not referring to me because my OP was not in the least critical of Sadowsky. I even said I would like to own a Sadowsky Modern.
Clearly you can see how this reads as if to say there's no reason to invest in an expensive instrument. That might be true for you and your personal tastes and requirements/needs, but obviously, not for everyone....the best of the mass production basses like Ernie Ball/MusicMan, Peavey (Cirrus), and G&L, are neck and neck with Sadowsky in terms of build quality.
...
What is also true, however, is that one can get very similar levels of performance without spending anywhere near Sadowsky money
There's a LOT more to it than that. It's simply not just about who can make the bass the cheapest or who can offer more finish colors and such. No mass production rig could ever ever compete with the small hand built shop for the "human" things that go in, and truly do matter to some folks in a very valid way, and as such hold real tangible value.It's just that a small shop cannot compete in terms of price with a major manufacturer; that is ECON 101. The advantage that Sadowsky has lies in customer service and the ability to make special orders more easily than a major shop.
Cheese, I luv ya, but yeah, I was.
While you weren't abusive, the crux of your post read as if to say there's no significant additional value in the more expensive instruments, and the way you stated them seemed fairly absolute. This WILL be viewed as generally critical by those who would disagree and feel those instruments are a lot nicer and worth a lot more. Case in point:
Clearly you can see how this reads as if to say there's no reason to invest in an expensive instrument. That might be true for you and your personal tastes and requirements/needs, but obviously, not for everyone.
Also, IMHO, it's invalid to simply equate everything to dollars and cents and manufacturing cost like this:
There's a LOT more to it than that. It's simply not just about who can make the bass the cheapest or who can offer more finish colors and such. No mass production rig could ever ever compete with the small hand built shop for the "human" things that go in, and truly do matter to some folks in a very valid way, and as such hold real tangible value.
A mass production shop is focused on manufacturing cost first, and actually does not want individuality, but instead consistency and repeatability, and is only concerned about "acceptable" quality commensurate with the final selling price. A small custom shop is focused first on quality and individuality, and manufacturing cost (basses/month) second... maybe a distant second, which is inversely related to price, of course.
It's an opposite business case. Apples/oranges.
You also threw lots of disclaimers in your post here and there, but those really seemed (at least to me) more as insertions to potentially use in your defense if people were to go after you for what I think most perceive as the crux of the post... also indicating you knew the slant of the post was critical, and you'd get the push back you are getting (and should expect).
Don't get me wrong, I completely agree that, for a lot of players out there, the more expensive stuff just doesn't make sense. But to suggest that the less expensive basses are truly comparable to more expensive ones in a more general sense, I think is invalid.
Trust me, I understand.What I guess I was really trying to convey was the notion of diminishing returns. IMO, boutique basses are expensive because reaching the last 5-10% towards "perfection" really becomes disproportionately expensive.
Which makes that determination much more specific to you than your original post seems to read. That's really what this all boils down to.I am not in the position to own one
If one doesn't share that opinion, then one should move on to some other thread.
Hypothetical question for you: How could anyone post a dissenting position in relation to your opinion that a Sadowsky was nice but didn't live up to the hype you'd heard on TB?Hypothetical questions for you: I haven't had the chance to play a Sadowsky yet but let's say that day comes, I'm not bowled over by it, and I start a thread about how the Sadowsky was nice but didn't live up to the hype I'd heard on TB. Would you post a dissenting position? How would you react if I told you to move on if you didn't share my opinion?