TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I will voice my questions once again, wishing for an honest answer instead of a fight.
Are they not bigger, more unwieldy and more prone to damage than electrics?
Do they not need amplification to be audible, especially when played live, along with other instruments?
Did you really replace your electrics in favor of one, and if so, why?
What exactly is it about their tone that you can't reproduce with an electric and electronic wizardry (hence, what makes an acoustic, irreplaceable)?
Did this arrive yet?Yes, thanks, someone earlier recommended this and another the Guild Junior Jumbo. I’ve opted for the Cordoba Mini II as the body is similarly sized to my Hofners but the Guilds are my Plan B if needed.
Go ahead and get one but IMHO don't spend too much on them.
They are fun around the house but just not practical to gig with.
lighter touches will result in less volume, high tension flat wounds will result in less volume, etc.
There is no EB (and associated electronic wizardry) that even remotely captures a DB sound for me, regardless of the endless “roll off the highs, put on flats, buy a P and play near the fretboard” discussions. Acoustic qualities are acoustic qualities, regardless of physical size. I get closer to the sound I provided for more than 50 years as a double bassist with an ABG. I cannot capture that with any EB, regardless of the electronics involved.
Just IMO only, light vs heavy touch has minimal impact on tonal quality. Compared to metal guys, I have the touch of a 1 year old girl, but after a lifetime of playing DB I’d venture my touch is heavier than many. Playing style/tone achievement is always impacted by touch to a degree, but not so much so that it would change your amplified sound. The acoustic nature of a hollow chamber provides much of an ABG’s unique quality.I'm actually very interested in that aspect, seeing as I never could test it. I tend (and consciously struggle to) play with a lighter touch because, apparently, myelopathy never 100% leaves you (...). If amplified, does the same apply? I mean, do you have to play an acoustic with a heavier touch or perhaps a pick to get the full benefits of their unique tone?
And speaking of tone...
Could you please post an example of that? I've watched a lot of videos with acoustic basses and could never really understand the uniqueness. I mean, sure, I hear some kind of difference but I can't really "feel" it, if you know what I mean.
And to add to that, do you really think an acoustic can blend in well in any kind of music? Say, could you get away with an acoustic playing heavy rock music?
Many thanks!
Just IMO only, light vs heavy touch has minimal impact on tonal quality. Compared to metal guys, I have the touch of a 1 year old girl, but after a lifetime of playing DB I’d venture my touch is heavier than many. Playing style/tone achievement is always impacted by touch to a degree, but not so much so that it would change your amplified sound. The acoustic nature of a hollow chamber provides much of an ABG’s unique quality.
Tracks & Clips
This is a link to a section on my website. Go to the bottom of that page and the last 4 tracks are live recordings with a fretless Breedlove Solo Jumbo outfitted with a soundhole plug, played through a Radial BassBone into a 15” powered PA speaker.
I have zero experience in heavy rock music … I’m an old school jazz guy and completely unqualified to answer your last question …
Yes, a video I made awhile back.Couple of extra questions, if you care to indulge me.
Is this picture yours? I see the soundhole's plugged. Do you ever have feedback issues when playing live? And if so, does the plug really help?
Also, in the clip you posted, is the mute from the picture in place?
I'd also love to hear how an acoustic responds to OD! Hell, if they are indeed viable I might as well get one! I still find them uncomfortable, especially the lack of upper body contours but I suppose a bowl design might be alright. The weight, especially considering my spinal issues is definitely enticing but I've only considered semi-hollow electrics instead.
It has a HUGE impact when playing unplugged which is what my post was about.Just IMO only, light vs heavy touch has minimal impact on tonal quality. Compared to metal guys, I have the touch of a 1 year old girl, but after a lifetime of playing DB I’d venture my touch is heavier than many. Playing style/tone achievement is always impacted by touch to a degree, but not so much so that it would change your amplified sound. The acoustic nature of a hollow chamber provides much of an ABG’s unique quality.
Gothic, I feel the unique tone they offer is in small campfire situations, etc.I'm actually very interested in that aspect, seeing as I never could test it. I tend (and consciously struggle to) play with a lighter touch because, apparently, myelopathy never 100% leaves you (...). If amplified, does the same apply? I mean, do you have to play an acoustic with a heavier touch or perhaps a pick to get the full benefits of their unique tone?
And speaking of tone...
Could you please post an example of that? I've watched a lot of videos with acoustic basses and could never really understand the uniqueness. I mean, sure, I hear some kind of difference but I can't really "feel" it, if you know what I mean.
And to add to that, do you really think an acoustic can blend in well in any kind of music? Say, could you get away with an acoustic playing heavy rock music?
Many thanks!
You meant what you said, and I understood it that way. And my reply to you was directed accordingly.So when I said "sell me on it", I actually meant (...)
I do not find my ABG the slightest bit unwieldy. Do the millions of humans who play acoustic guitars find them "unwieldy"?Are they not bigger, more unwieldy and more prone to damage than electrics?
Usually yes.Do they not need amplification to be audible, especially when played live, along with other instruments?
To me it's nothing about the tone. It's the simple fact that I can start playing bass without having to fire up an amp. An amp that may even bother the people around me, especially in the middle of the night.What exactly is it about their tone that you can't reproduce with an electric and electronic wizardry (hence, what makes an acoustic, irreplaceable)

Hmmmmm...?All this brings up an old question that seems to be still unanswered: why don't ABGs have their own place here on TB?
My favourite example is the Effects Forum. That place was haunted by naysayers for years, for there are many bassists who won't have anything to do with effect pedals, and some of those never stopped bugging every thread there, making a healthy discussion about any pedal impossible.
So the Effects Forum is now blessed with an extra strict anti-naysayer policy. Don't ABGs need something similar?
All this brings up an old question that seems to be still unanswered: why don't ABGs have their own place here on TB?
My favourite example is the Effects Forum. That place was haunted by naysayers for years, for there are many bassists who won't have anything to do with effect pedals, and some of those never stopped bugging every thread there, making a healthy discussion about any pedal impossible.
So the Effects Forum is now blessed with an extra strict anti-naysayer policy. Don't ABGs need something similar?
PERSONAL OPINION ALERT (not "Voice of TB Staff", see also "thinking out loud" alert):
My initial thought is that there's a few strikes against the idea.
The main one is that I see new ABG-related threads posted perhaps a few times a month, whereas multiple effects-related threads get posted daily. Even the dedicated ABG club thread can go many days without a single post.
The other is , "If ABG's need a forum, what about ...?" Should 5 string basses have their own forum? 6? Should "more than 6" be a forum or need there be multiples? Basses with courses of strings?
OTOH, there are specific "no trolling" rules beyond the Effects forum - the "no ugly bass comments" rule for one.
It might (or might not) be hard to come up with a reasonable "no trolling" rule for ABG's - the fact that they are "generally not loud enough to play unamplified with a group of musicians" is a true and reasonable thing to say, but it sure gets tiresome to read a dozen times in a thread. OTOH, the repetition goes with the fact that it's many people's experience... But "ABG's suck" seems pretty unambiguously trollish.
Thanks for chiming in.It might (or might not) be hard to come up with a reasonable "no trolling" rule for ABG's - the fact that they are "generally not loud enough to play unamplified with a group of musicians" is a true and reasonable thing to say, but it sure gets tiresome to read a dozen times in a thread. OTOH, the repetition goes with the fact that it's many people's experience.
Spoken by a wise man.Another thing I try to keep in mind is that I don't have to participate in threads just to hear myself talk. I can have an opinion on all sorts of things, but having an opinion is not the same as being informed or experienced. Sometimes that witty quip or extended treatise is best kept in my head. If I don't have anything relevant to the OP's question or continuing discussion, or if my participation is going to get me or others riled up, maybe I should sit it out.