• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Adding a Bridge cover: yay or nay?

Add the bridge cover?

  • Yes

    Votes: 156 57.1%
  • No

    Votes: 117 42.9%

  • Total voters
    273
The only bass with a cover that I have is a Gibson EB-3. It would look odd without. None of my Fenders have them although I have a set of covers I could put on my Am Std P.

View attachment 738702
Ah! The variant that has the mudbucker farther from the end of the fretboard and closer to the bridge - my favorite variant. If I had the cash, that is about the only bass I don't own that I would like to.
 
The cover gets a bit in the way but it is not as bad. I consider it to be the best way to cover a mute. Since you will be using flats on it I voted yes.




It does fit but not with where the standard screw holes are. You would have to move the cover a bit closer to bridge. The jazz bass cover won't work with a badass bridge, because no matter how far up you take it, it won't be able to cover the bridge pickup.

Meh it looks cooler with the Badass II on it anyways for me. I personally like the ever-so-slightly-more sustain I get from the Badass and it looks sturdy.

Anyways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bigbri
I love the 'classic' look of a bridge cover.
The only hesitation I'd have is if, as mentioned above, you use palm-muting...and of course string-changing also becomes slightly more trouble.
I have some schaller and badass bridges. The schaller is exactly like the badass with small aesthetics
 

Attachments

  • sch.jpg
    sch.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 67
Covers on: EB-2dc, Thunderbird, Precision.

No covers: Fretless 'Bird, Gibson EB, guitars.

I might put covers on the fretless 'Bird, just because. I thought about a bridge cover on the EB, but it's got that oddball reversed Jazz body shape, and I can't figure out what cover to put on it. Maybe a traditional Gibson bridge cover. I like ashtrays a lot.
 
Ah! The variant that has the mudbucker farther from the end of the fretboard and closer to the bridge - my favorite variant. If I had the cash, that is about the only bass I don't own that I would like to.

Mine sure goes from "shake the room" to "growl". I also have a SG bass with the humbucker at the neck, but I like the EB-3 much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BassGreaser
I'd say the pickup cover is way more useless. At least the bridge cover has a mute in it that would prove useful to some. Marcus has even stated that he keeps the PU cover on his bass because he likes a little bling on his bass.
 
After 45 years playing a '69 pbass I changed the Baddass to a Wilkinson copy of the original bridge. Also put on the bridge cover, but now I hear some strange chorus-like sounds, especially when playing muted with heavy Fender flatwounds (bought long ago). Without the cover no sounds. The cover is free from the bridge. Anyone else who experience(d) this?
I like the cover because it protects my hand from the little adjustmentscrews in the bridge, and yes, it looks nice.