Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Wow, opinion is dead split. Me, I hate covers. Even with flats, I like the choice of being able to mute the strings or not.
SirMjac28
Patiently Waiting For The Next British Invasion
Actually, the reason I want a cover is for the foam mute strip inside.
By having the foam attached I can sculpt it till I get the right sustain on each string. Then - Go from ringing to thump with two screws.
And prettier than putting the foam under the strings.
+1 plus it keeps the bridge from catching my cooties.
We spend a lot of energy worrying about what other people may think. In my younger playing days I had two P basses and both had the covers. (FWIW I'm talking the late sixties/early seventies.) I played with fingers and with picks at different times and found the bridge cover a plus so it stayed but the pickup cover was a minus so it came off. I got some grief for leaving that uncool cover over the bridge but I was the player so, again, the cover stayed. You should decide what you want and do that.
Add the cover. Take pictures. Take the cover off. Throw it in a drawer. Play the bass.
The cover gets a bit in the way but it is not as bad. I consider it to be the best way to cover a mute. Since you will be using flats on it I voted yes.
It does fit but not with where the standard screw holes are. You would have to move the cover a bit closer to bridge. The jazz bass cover won't work with a badass bridge, because no matter how far up you take it, it won't be able to cover the bridge pickup.
It does fit but not with where the standard screw holes are. You would have to move the cover a bit closer to bridge. The jazz bass cover won't work with a badass bridge, because no matter how far up you take it, it won't be able to cover the bridge pickup.
To clear this up for you:
Single-coil pbass covers:
Split coil pbass covers:
Link Removed
Jazz bass covers:
Link Removed
As you can see the bridge cover on the Jazz bass is much longer and it is stamped with the F letter. It is beyond me what they were thinking with covers of the Jazz bass since they cover a very big part of the playing area. I tried putting them on my Jazz and it was the most uncomfortable experience I ever had.
It indeed is. The reason for that is that those came with a piece of foam glued under the cover to mute the strings. If you flipped it the other way around the foam would not touch the string anymore.
P basses look nice with ashtrays. Go ahead and put it on. Now you can put it to use, right? They definitely look more classy with the cover.
ALTHOUGH, If you like playing as close as possible to the bridge and get that, kind of "twangy" sound, don't put it on.
ALTHOUGH, If you like playing as close as possible to the bridge and get that, kind of "twangy" sound, don't put it on.
I love the look of both bridge and pickup covers on a P Bass. However as mentioned they get in the way when playing. Especially the pickup cover. So ya go for it out the bridge cover on and rock out!
They look cool but they get in the way when playing close to the bridge and make palm muting impossible. The ones over the pickups are even worse.
+1 to this.
I finally took mine off because it was limiting what I could do with the bass. Love the look but needed the functionality more.
FF
I like them. Thinking of adding one to my Epiphone EB-0. On my first Jazz bass ended up putting on a P bass bridge cover. Just liked the look. Something different.
Big Hoss
Up note, down note, blue note, brown note...
- Sep 5, 2014
- 5,455
- 4,234
- Disclosures
- None
Up to you. I won't be doing it any time soon myself, but I understand the appeal. For me the issues they cause with muting, string changes, and the extra weight that would have been better assigned to a high mass bridge, not to mention they don't like to fit over high mass bridges, just kills them for me.
Yes, that is the only real reason for adding a bridge cover. Foam under cover and pushing down on the strings is better than foam underneath.Actually, the reason I want a cover is for the foam mute strip inside.
By having the foam attached I can sculpt it till I get the right sustain on each string. Then - Go from ringing to thump with two screws.
And prettier than putting the foam under the strings.
foam underneath can push up too much against the strings and cause intonation problems. Even if you slot the foam for the strings to fit I still think foam pushing down sounds better to my ear. As always your mileage may vary.
