TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I’m looking to warm and fatten up, especially the higher end, with gooey tubiness - not looking for breakup and distortion.
I’m talking about pre vs post effects. I don’t mean my IEMs or stage monitor could or should ever sound the same as any particular location in the room. Sorry I was not clear there.Sorry but it really doesn't work this way. Sound needs to be processed discretely for different listening locations and listening purposes. What you need to hear on stage to play well is not the same as what is needed for the bass to sit properly in the house mix. The way you perceive your tone is different when you are playing versus listening. Also the acoustics in the room are a very big factor, especially compared to IEMs which isolate your sound from the acoustic environment. The IEMs will sound different than the PA cabs. Even if both are considered flat, they won't sound the exactly same.
If you want to know what the bass sounds like to the audience. Either record the bass or get a looper. Play the loop and go out to the sound console and take a listen. However, keep in mind the tone we like when playing solo typically does not work well in a mix. So to really hear what you sound like playing with the band, you need a recording of the entire band. I believe some mixers can capture each channel, so it's possible.
Lastly music changes continuously. IME it's pretty rare for the audio to simply sit back and listen for extended periods of time. Usually the audio tech will need to constantly dial things in as the music changes.
So my advice: Worry about how you sound in the IEMs. Also, hire an audio tech you trust who understands the bands sound concept and let him/her do their job. I.E. get out the way.
As far as what I want, more warmth and tube fatness - I like the sound of the V4B a lot more than the VT Bass, and thought a real tube pre might get closer than the simulator does. I know it won’t be the same, but hoped for closer.Just to get some more clarity - what is it that your VT bass isn't giving you regarding the higher frequencies?
I felt that the VT bass adds a good amount of warmth and girth to the bass tone.
I have:
Sushibox Finally and Neptunium
Sansamp: BDDI, Paradriver, VT bass Deluxe, Q strip, Bass Fly rig V1
Origin Effects - Super Vintage
Joyo American Sound
Spark boost - 4 knob version
I'm probably forgetting one or two others.
It's fun to try out different pre amps and tube DIs, but honestly, for gigging and live music, I feel like a lot of subtlety gets lost. For me, the higher end preamps make more sense for recording or for headphone practice.
Once we are moving air and playing live, the small differences in tone are kind of overwhelmed by the overall sound of my amp and cab, and the sonic interactions from the drums and guitar.
It is nice to have a great live sound though. Unfortunately, in the end I feel like we are at the mercy of the person running sound and their equipment and their biases about bass tone.
I love my FinallyA Finally is a a very cost effective option to get a tube DI. I run a cali and Linden into it and it works for me on my little board
That's a matter of opine as are most comments on this thread. Buy/use what works for you and your situation. There's no "blow away the competition"I am really surprised that people didn’t mention the Arkham Oracle, which would blow away most of the competition mentioned here.
Of course it is a matter of opinion. But when you compare several features of the aforementioned products, like price, versatility, “tubeness”, build quality, et cetera, then it’s not hard to get to some kind of favourites list. That’s how these forums work. The Arkham has always been very popular here, so I found it interesting that no one brought it up before.That's a matter of opine as are most comments on this thread. Buy/use what works for you and your situation. There's no "blow away the competition"
with any tube DI.
Wow - no, I hadn’t seen that. That is quite a list! Thank you!I’ve been through a lot of tube preamps. Not all are created equal. Have you seen this narrative with audio samples?
https://www.talkbass.com/threads/tu...-15-super-stack-reddi-tonecraft-jule.1469686/
It was mentioned further up the thread - #11 on page 1 - I believe. <shrug>Of course it is a matter of opinion. But when you compare several features of the aforementioned products, like price, versatility, “tubeness”, build quality, et cetera, then it’s not hard to get to some kind of favourites list. That’s how these forums work. The Arkham has always been very popular here, so I found it interesting that no one brought it up before.
This! Using a tube pre in front of a tube DI gives you lots of flexibility to shape your tone as you like. There are so many flavors of tone available with the many available tube pres, and no doubt you will find one to your liking.Honestly, for "fat and warm" I would consider a di with a preamp. A
Chiming in as someone who owned several VT Bass pedals on and off over the last 15 years or so:Just to get some more clarity - what is it that your VT bass isn't giving you regarding the higher frequencies?
I felt that the VT bass adds a good amount of warmth and girth to the bass tone.